. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1990). MusicCAT: An adaptive testing program to assess musical ability. In Paper presented at the ADCIS 32nd International Conference. San Diego CA.
. (1994). Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.
. (1990). Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.
. (1993). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test of tonal memory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 111-136.
. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.
. (1987). An adaptive test of musical memory: An application of item response theory to the assessment of musical ability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 79A.
. (1996). Effects of answer feedback and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1999). Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 151-176). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779-788.
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (1997). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (1987). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
. (1992). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.
. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1998). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.
. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (2000). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.
. (1998). Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-345.
. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.
. (1992). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1982). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.
. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (1992). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (Senior) Computerized adaptive test. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.
. (1997). Applications of Bayesian decision theory to sequential mastery testing (Research Report 97-06). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2001). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential testing problems in psychodiagnostics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 139-159.
. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2001). Multidimensional IRT-based adaptive sequential mastery testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.
. (2000). A minimax solution for sequential classification problems. In . H. A. L. Kiers, J.-P.Rasson, P. J. F. Groenen, and M. Schader (Eds.), Data analysis, classification, and related methods (pp. 121-126). Berlin: Springer. .
. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.
. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.
. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.
. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1990). An adaptive algebra test: A testlet-based, hierarchically structured test with validity-based scoring. ETS Technical Report 90-92.
. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (1991). Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.