A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed-frequency audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 1-22.
. (1979). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947-956.
. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for patients with knee inpairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 1113-1124.
. (2008). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.
. (2005). ha05629.pdf (227.89 KB)Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 290-8.
. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.
. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017
. (2006). Development of an index of physical functional health status in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 655-65. presented at the May.
. (2002). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (1998). . (2006).
. (1990).
The effects of item pool depth on the accuracy of pass/fail decisions for NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
. (1994). An investigation of item calibration procedures for a computerized licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco, CA.
. (1995). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28-II42.
. (2000). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
. (2014). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.
. (2005). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854
. (2020). . (2003).
Theoretical results and item selection from multidimensional item bank in the Mokken IRT model for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 337–352.
. (1995). Scaling of two-stage adaptive test configurations for achievement testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1992). An NCME instructional module on multistage testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 44-52.
. (2007). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.
. (1989). Adaptive and Conventional Versions of the DAT: The First Complete Test Battery Comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 363-371.
. (1989). v13n4p363.pdf (1.06 MB) . (2005).
A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).
. (1994). v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)A comparison of item calibration media in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 197-204.
. (1994). Item Calibration: Medium-of-administration effect on computerized adaptive scores (TR-93-9). Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1993). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In , Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Evaluating item calibration medium in computerized adaptive testing. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters and J.R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 161-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1989). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
. (2012). Design and evaluation of an XML-based platform-independent computerized adaptive testing system. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 230-237.
. (2005). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.
. (2002). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
. (1995). Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative ASVAB testing concepts at MET sites. Interim report to Defense Manpower Data Center. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI, Inc.
. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.
. (2007). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12
. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits.pdf (518.72 KB)A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268
. (2005). A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.
. (2005). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Motivation Items: Administration Mode Effects and a Comparison With Short Forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429. doi:10.1177/0146621606297314
. (2007). Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.
. (2001). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.
. (2006). A simulation study of some simple approaches to the study of DIF for CATs. Internal memorandum, Educational Testing Service.
. (1991). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.
. (2004). The AMC Linear Disability Score project in a population requiring residential care: psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Aug 3.
. (2004). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
. (1999). Effects of feedback during self-adapted testing on estimates of ability. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1992). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1970). A Mixture Rasch Model–Based Computerized Adaptive Test for Latent Class Identification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 469-493. doi:10.1177/0146621612450068
. (2012). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.
. (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
. (2004). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
. (1995). Benefits from computerized adaptive testing as seen in simulation studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 91-98.
. (1999). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing. Programmed Larning and Educational Technology, 16, 164-169.
. (1979). A validity study of an adaptive test of reading comprehension. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 57-67). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1980). ho80-01.pdf (675.09 KB)Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing strategies. In Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing. University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
. (1977).