Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.
. (1990). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.
. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.
. (1995). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1995). The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33-40.
. (1992). v16n1p033.pdf (584.06 KB)An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.
. (1994). Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.
. (1994). . (1994).
The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.
. (1992). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.
. (1991). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
. (2018). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790
. (2017). Computer-adaptive test for measuring personality factors using item response theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 999.
. (2003). . (1992).
catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (2011). Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.
. (2011). An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09makransky.pdf (364.64 KB)Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756
. (2012). The Applicability of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Ability Measurement in Organizational Assessment. International Journal of Testing, 13, 123-139. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.672352
. (2013). The applicability of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing to cognitive ability measurement in organizational assessment. International Journal of Testing, 13(2), 123-139. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.672352
. (2013). Optimizing cognitive ability measurement with multidimensional computer adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing.
. (In Press). An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 11.
. (2010). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
. (2012). Guido Makransky Dissertation.pdf (2.72 MB)Application of Dimension Reduction to CAT Item Selection Under the Bifactor Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 419-434. doi:10.1177/0146621618813086
. (2019). The Application of the Monte Carlo Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 482-496. doi:10.1177/0146621613486015
. (2013). Swedish Enlistment Battery: Construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT-SEB. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 107-114.
. (1998). Policy and program management perspective. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters, and J.R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). ma83-01.pdf (2.72 MB)Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web
. (2017). Comparing methods to recalibrate drifting items in computerized adaptive testing. In American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
. (2009). Recalibrating Drifting Items in CAT MS.docx (543.3 KB)Effects of item parameter error and other factors on trait estimation in latent trait based adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
. (1983). A comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood scoring in a simulated stradaptive test. Unpublished Masters thesis, St. Mary’s University of Texas, San Antonio TX.
. (1978). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1981). ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB)Measuring change conventionally and adaptively. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 882-897.
. (1998). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
. (1988). . (1984).
Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
. (1987). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 224-236). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). A computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington DC.
. (1986). Some Properties of a Bayesian Adaptive Ability Testing Strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 121-140.
. (1977). v01n1p121.pdf (1.33 MB)Adaptive mental testing: The state of the art (Technical Report 423). Washington DC: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
. (1976). Computerized adaptive testing: An overview and an example. In Presented at the Assessment Conference of the Education Commission of the States. Boulder, CO.
. (1985). Adaptive verbal ability testing in a military setting. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 4-15). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). mcb80-01.pdf (657.66 KB)Modification of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) for use by recruiters in all military services. Final Technical Report FR-WATSD-97-24, Contract No. MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
. (1997). What lies ahead? Computer technology and its implications for personnel testing. In Keynote address. NATO Workshop on Computer-based Assessment of Military Personnel, Brussels, Belgium.
. (1991). A brief overview of adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB) . (1985).
Development of a computerized adaptive testing system for enlisted personnel selection. In Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC.
. (1982). Adaptive mental testing: The state of the art (Technical Report 423). Alexandria VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
. (1979). Can We Assess Pre-K Kids With Computer-Based Tests: STAR Early Literacy Data. In Presentation to the 33rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. San Antonio TX.
. (2003). Evaluation of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1992). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1976). mcb76-02.pdf (1.86 MB)Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.
. (1994). Applications of latent trait theory to criterion-referenced testing. In . D.J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
. (1978). CAST 5 for Windows users' guide. Contract No. "MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
. (1997). Preliminary psychometric research for CAT-ASVAB: Selecting an adaptive testing strategy. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 83-95). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing made practical: The Computerized Adaptive Edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Presented at the U.S. Department of Labor National Test Development Conference. San Francisco, CA.
. (1987).