English, R. A., Reckase, M. D., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Application of tailored testing to achievement measurement. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 158-161.

Engdahl, B. (1992). Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Embretson, S. E. (1999). Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models. Psychometrika, 64, 407-433.

Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P. Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Embretson, S. E. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing: Its potential substantive contribution to psychological research and assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 129-133.

Elwood, D. L., & Griffin, H. R.. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.

Elwood, D. L. (1969). Automation of psychological testing. American Psychologist, 24, 287-289.

Elhan, A. H., Oztuna, D., Kutlay, S., Kucukdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A.. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., & Schaffer, G. A.. (1995). Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Folk, V.G.,, Li, M. - Y., & Stocking, M. L.. (1994). Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Eignor, D. R. (1993). Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Eggen, T. (1999). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 249-261.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T. (2001). Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Eggen, T. (2010). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Eggen, T. (1998). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Measurement and Research Department Report, 98-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Eggen, T. (2004). Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Citogroep.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2004). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A.. (2003). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. Manchester UK.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Egberink, I. J. L., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2007). The development of a computerized adaptive test for integrity. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., Veldkamp, B. P., Schakel, L., & Smid, N. G.. (2010). Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.

Edwards, M. C., Flora, D. B., & Thissen, D.. (2012). Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing With Uniform Item Exposure. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 118-141. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.660363

Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D.. (2007). Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Computer adaptive testing quality requirements. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 288-295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Adaptive orientation methods in computer adaptive testing. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 1290-1295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Personalized feedback in CAT. In . WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, Issue 3, Volume 2,174-181, July 2005.

Dunkel, P. A. (1997). Computer-adaptive testing of listening comprehension: A blueprint of CAT Development. The Language Teacher Online 21, no. 10. .

Dunkel, P. (1999). Research and development of a computer-adaptive test of listening comprehension in the less-commonly taught language Hausa. In . M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.). Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J.. (1993). Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 181-193.

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J.. (1994). Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory (Research Report 94-37). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Drasgow, F. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P. Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B.. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C.. (2006). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Dowling, C. E., & Kaluscha, R.. (1995). Prerequisite relationships for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. In . Greer, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of AIED'95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington, DC, AACE 43-50.

Dowling, C. E., Hockemeyer, C., & Ludwig, A. H.. (1996). Adaptive assessment and training using the neighbourhood of knowledge states. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montral, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 578-587.

Doucette, D. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.

Dorronsoro, J. R., Santa-Cruz, C., Rubio Franco, V. J., & Aguado García, D.. (2000). Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima información para la selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado. Psicothema, 12, 12-14.

Doong, S. H. (2009). A Knowledge-Based Approach for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 530-558. doi:10.3102/1076998609336667

Donadello, I., Spoto, A., Sambo, F., Badaloni, S., Granziol, U., & Vidotto, G.. (2017). ATS-PD: An Adaptive Testing System for Psychological Disorders. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 792-815. doi:10.1177/0013164416652188

Dolan, S. (1993). A comparison of computer adaptive test administration methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304

Dodd, B. G. (1990). The Effect of Item Selection Procedure and Stepsize on Computerized Adaptive Attitude Measurement Using the Rating Scale Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 355-366.

Dodd, B. G. (1990). The effect of item selection procedure and stepsize on computerized adaptive attitude measurement using the rating scale model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 355-386.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1988). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model: Effects of item pool characteristics and different stopping rules. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 61-77.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.

Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. Philadelphia PA.

Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In J. J. Fremer & Ward, W. C., Computer-based testing. Mahwah, N.J., USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Dodd, B. G. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing with the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the Fourth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Chicago.

Dodd, B. G., de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 5–22.