Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2004). Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.
. (2008). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (2000).
Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.
. (2006). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2008). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.
. (2004). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.
. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.
. (2000). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
. (2004). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (2007). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.
. (2004). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.
. (1998). . (2008).
Some New Developments in Adaptive Testing.pdf (544.66 KB)
![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.
. (1990). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.
. (2007). . (2010).
The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.
. (1999). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
. (2022). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.
. (1994). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.
. (2003). Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
. (2007). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-94.
. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.
. (1999). Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.
. (2010). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.
. (1992). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.
. (1996). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (2011). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.
. (2006). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1997). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (1991). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.
. (2008). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.
. (1996). . (2006).
Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three parameter model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3148.
. (1988). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.
. (1982). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
. (2000). An application of computer adaptive testing with communication handicapped examinees. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 23-35.
. (1986). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1993). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.
. (2006). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
. (2019). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.
. (1999). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.
. (2006). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.
. (2007). Applications of network flows to computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 0855.
. (1998). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.
. (2002). . (1998).
Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (1999). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (2006). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.
. (1989). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In , New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
. (2002). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
. (1987). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
. (1999). Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.
. (1993). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In , Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.
. (2000).