Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., Harmes, J. C., & Sentovich, C.. (2001). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Pashley, P. (1997). An overview of the LSAC CAT research agenda. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E.. (2007). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.

Pastor, D. A., Chiang, C., Dodd, B. G., & and Yockey, R.. (1999). Performance of the Sympson-Hetter exposure control algorithm with a polytomous item bank. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Patience, W. M. (1990). Software review: MicroCAT Testing System Version 3. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 82-88.

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Patience, W. M. (1977). Description of components in tailored testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 153-157.

Patience, W. M.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Effects of program parameters and item pool characteristics on the bias of a three-parameter tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Boston MA, U.

Patsula, L. N. (1999). A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Patsula, L. N. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.

Patsula, L. N., & Steffen, M.. (1997). Maintaining item and test security in a CAT environment: A simulation study. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL).

Patsula, L. N., & McLeod, L. D.. (2000). Detecting test-takers who have memorized items in computerized-adaptive testing and muti-stage testing: A comparison. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Patsula, L. N., & Hambleton, R. K.. (1999). A comparative study of ability estimates from computer-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.

Patton, J. M., Ying Cheng,, Yuan, K. - H., & Diao, Q.. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727

Penfield, R. D. (2007). Estimating the Standard Error of the Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimator in Adaptive Testing Using the Posterior-Weighted Test Information Function. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 958-975. doi:10.1177/0013164407301544

Penfield, R. D. (2006). Applying Bayesian item selection approaches to adaptive tests using polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 1-20.

Pennell, R. J., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Adaptive Branching in a Multi-Content Achievement Test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Chie, W. C., Conroy, T., Costantini, A., et al.. (2010). Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension. Quality of Life Research , 20, 479-490.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Fayers, P., Sprangers, M., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2006). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: basic developments and evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 15, 315-29. presented at the Apr.

Peterson, K. A., L., D. M., & Hjelseth, L.. (2005). Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.

Phankokkruad, M., & Woraratpanya, K.. (2008). An Automated Decision System for Computer Adaptive Testing Using Genetic Algorithms. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2008. SNPD'08. Ninth ACIS International Conference on (pp. 655–660). IEEE.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Pine, S. M. (1977). Reduction of Test Bias by Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z.. (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Pitkin, A. K., & Vispoel, W. P.. (2001). Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.

PITON-GONÇALVES, J., ALUISIO, S. M., MENDONCA, L. H., & NOVAES, O. O.. (2004). A learning environment for english for academic purposes based on adaptive tests and task-based systems. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. . Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Pitoniak, M. J. (2000). Testlet-based Designs for Computer-Based Testing in a Certification and Licensure Setting. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA Technical Report.

Pohl, S. (2013). Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028

Pollack, I. (1968). Methodological determination of the PEST (parameter estimation by sequential testing) procedure. Perception and psychophysics, 3, 285-289.

Pommerich, M., & Burden, T.. (2000). From simulation to application: Examinees react to computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. New Orleans, April 2000.

Pommerich, M. (2007). The Effect of Using Item Parameters Calibrated from Paper Administrations in Computer Adaptive Test Administrations. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5.

Pommerich, M., Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (2009). The nine lives of CAT-ASVAB: Innovations and revelations. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2008). Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00061.x

Pommerich, M. (2007). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Ponsoda, V., Olea, J.,, & Revuelta, J.. (1994). ADTEST: A computer-adaptive tests based on the maximum information principle. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 680-686.

Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., Rodriguez, M. S., & Revuelta, J.. (1999). The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 167-184.

Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing. In . R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.): Encyclopaedia of Psychological Assessment. London: Sage.

Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section. Psicológica, 21, 115-120.

Ponsoda, V., Wise, S. L., Olea, J., & Revuelta, J.. (1997). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.

Potenza, M. T., & Stocking, M. L.. (1997). Flawed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 79-96.

Potenza, M. (1994). The exploration of an alternative method for scoring computer adaptive tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska.

Powell, Z. - H. E. (1992). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.

Powell, Z. E. (1994). The psychological impacts of computerized adaptive testing methods. Educational Technology, 34, 41-47.

Powell, Z. E. (1992). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. In Richmond IN: Indiana University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334910 and/or TM018223). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Powers, D. E. (2001). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General test. Journal of educational computing research, 24 (3), 249-273.

Powers, D. E. (1999). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the GRE General Test (Research Report 99-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Prestwood, J. S. (1977). Effects of Knowledge of Results and Varying Proportion Correct on Ability Test Performance and Psychological Variables. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Prestwood, J. S., Vale, C. D., Massey, R. H., & Welsh, J. R.. (1985). Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery: Development of an adaptive item pool (AFHLR-TR-85-19; Technical Rep No 85-19). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Puhan, G., & Gierl, M.. (2003). Evaluating the comparability of English- and French-speaking examinees on a science achievement test administered using two-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Qing Yi,, Jinming Zhang,, & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Severity of Organized Item Theft in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Simulation Study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 543-558. doi:10.1177/0146621607311336

Quan, B., Park, T. A., Sandahl, G., & Wolfe, J. H.. Microcomputer network for computer­ized adaptive testing (CAT) . NPRDC-TR-84-33. San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. Retrieved from https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a140256.pdf

Quan, B., Park, T. A., Sandahl, G., & Wolfe, J. H.. (1984). Microcomputer network for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) (TR-84-33). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Rache, G. (2000). La distribution dchantillonnage en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux rgles darrt : selon lerreur type et selon le nombre ditems administrs [Sampling distribution of the proficiency estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping.. Doctoral thesis, Montreal: University of Montreal.