Adaptive Testing Applied to Hierarchically Structured Objectives-Based Programs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). ha77290.pdf (1.37 MB)Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
. (1994). Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
. (1994). Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1995). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1998). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). A method for building a realistic model of test taker behavior for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 01-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). Scoring alternatives for incomplete computerized adaptive tests (Research Report 01-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).
. (2002).