. (1997). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1999). The precision of ability estimation methods for computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB). (2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for “Anxiety” (Anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 16, 143-155.
. (2010). Adaptive Tests for Measuring Anxiety and Depression. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 123-136). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.
. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.
. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1991). Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.
. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.
. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
. (1990). An adaptive algebra test: A testlet-based, hierarchically structured test with validity-based scoring. ETS Technical Report 90-92.
. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.
. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2001). Multidimensional IRT-based adaptive sequential mastery testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2001). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential testing problems in psychodiagnostics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 139-159.
. (2000). A minimax solution for sequential classification problems. In . H. A. L. Kiers, J.-P.Rasson, P. J. F. Groenen, and M. Schader (Eds.), Data analysis, classification, and related methods (pp. 121-126). Berlin: Springer. .
. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.
. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.
. (1997). Applications of Bayesian decision theory to sequential mastery testing (Research Report 97-06). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1992). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (Senior) Computerized adaptive test. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (1982). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.
. (1997). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (1987). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779-788.
. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.
. (1992). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.
. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1998). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1992). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.