. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2005). Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2005). An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2001). Item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items--approximation methods for scale scores. In Test scoring (pp. 289-315). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
. (2017). Generating Rationales to Support Formative Feedback in Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O5KDFtQlDLvhNoDr7X4JO4arpJkIHKUP
. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In , Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (2001). Nouveaux développements dans le domaine du testing informatisé [New developments in the area of computerized testing]. Psychologie Française, 46, 221-230.
. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.
. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.
. (1997). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.
. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.
. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.
. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.
. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2001). Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.
. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.
. (2016). Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101
Colvin FINAL.pdf (630.27 KB). (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.
. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.
. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.
. (2006). Adaptive success control in computerized adaptive testing. Psychology Science, 48, 436-450.
. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB). (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 van Groen Eggen Veldkamp Item Selection.pdf (593.82 KB). (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.
. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.
. (2003). Developing an initial physical function item bank from existing sources. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 124-36.
. (2009). Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.
. (2005). An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.
. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.
. (2004). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62-172. presented at the Jan.
. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2004). The AMC Linear Disability Score project in a population requiring residential care: psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Aug 3.
. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.
. (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.
ha05629.pdf (227.89 KB). (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.
. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.
. (2008). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.
. (2000). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28-II42.