Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination. AANA.J, 64, 119-124.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Stahl, J. A.. (1992). Assessing existing item bank depth for computer adaptive testing. In ERIC Document No. TM022404.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Computer adaptive versus paper-and-pencil tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Betz, N. E., & Turner, B. M.. (2011). Using Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing in Online Career Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 274-286. doi:10.1177/1069072710395534

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 259-266.

Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of Immediate Knowledge of Results and Adaptive Testing on Ability Test Performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 259-266.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.

Bickel, P., Buyske, S., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability. Psychometrika, 66, 69-77.

Bill, B. C. (1984). A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1915). A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children. Chicago: Chicago Medical Book Co.

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1908). Le development de lintelligence chez les enfants. LAnee Psychologique, 14, 1-94.

Binet, A., & Simon, T. A.. (1905). Mthode nouvelle pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L'Anne Psychologique, 11, 191-244.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. - H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B.. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95-108.

Bjorner, J. B. (2004). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.

Blais, J. G. (2002). Historique et concepts propres au testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing: Historical accounts and concepts]. In Presented at the 69th Congress of the Acfas. Sherbrooke: Association canadienne française pour l’avancement des sciences (Acfas). [In French].

Blais, J. G., & Raiche, G.. (2010). Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 424-31.

Blais, J. - G., & Raiche, G.. (2002). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Blais, J. - G., & Raîche, G.. (2005). Features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In . D. G. Englehard (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice. Volume 6.

Bloxom, B. M., & Vale, C. D.. (1987). Multidimensional adaptive testing: A procedure for sequential estimation of the posterior centroid and dispersion of theta. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Montreal, Canada.

Bochner, J., Garrison, W., Palmer, L., MacKenzie, D., & Braveman, A.. (1997). A computerized adaptive testing system for speech discrimination measurement: The Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 101, 2289-298.

Bock, B. D.,, Muraki, E., & Pfeiffenberger, W.. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.

Bock, R. D., & Zimowski, M. F.. (1998). Feasibility studies of two-stage testing in large-scale educational assessment: Implications for NAEP. American Institutes for Research, CA.

Bock, B. D.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444.

Bock, R. D. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 46-49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bode, R. K., Cella, D., Lai, J. S., & Heinemann, A. W.. (2003). Developing an initial physical function item bank from existing sources. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 124-36.

Bode, R. K., Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Heinemann, A. W., Shevrin, D., Von Roenn, J., & Cella, D.. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.

Bontempo, B., Julian, E. R., & Gorham, J. L.. (1997). Assessing speededness in variable-length computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bontempo, B. D. (2011). Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Montowidlo, S. J., Drasgow, F., Foster, L., & Kubisiak, U. C.. (1998). Computerized adaptive rating scales that measure contextual performance. In Paper presented at the 3th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas TX.

Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Kubisiak, U. C., & Buck, D. E.. (2000). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Born, S., & Frey, A.. (2017). Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 241-262. doi:10.1177/0013164416643744

Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: the Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1, 3, 5.

Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).

Bowers, D. R. (1992). Computer-based adaptive testing in music research and instruction. Psychomusicology, 10, 49-63.

Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.

Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Boyd, A. M. (2003). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (2003). A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H.,, & Wang, X.. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets . Psychometrika, 64, 153-168.

Bradlow, E. T., Weiss, R. E., & Cho, M.. (1998). Bayesian identification of outliers in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 910-919.