Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al.. (2005). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S.. (1978). Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S.. (1977). Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota.

English, R. A., Reckase, M. D., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Application of tailored testing to achievement measurement. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 158-161.

Engdahl, B. (1992). Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P. Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Embretson, S. E. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing: Its potential substantive contribution to psychological research and assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 129-133.

Embretson, S. E. (1999). Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models. Psychometrika, 64, 407-433.

Elwood, D. L. (1969). Automation of psychological testing. American Psychologist, 24, 287-289.

Elwood, D. L., & Griffin, H. R.. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.

Elhan, A. H., Oztuna, D., Kutlay, S., Kucukdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A.. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., & Schaffer, G. A.. (1995). Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R. (1993). Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Folk, V.G.,, Li, M. - Y., & Stocking, M. L.. (1994). Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A.. (2003). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. Manchester UK.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.

Eggen, T. (2001). Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T. (1999). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 249-261.

Eggen, T. (1998). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Measurement and Research Department Report, 98-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Eggen, T. (2004). Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Citogroep.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2004). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

Eggen, T. (2010). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., Veldkamp, B. P., Schakel, L., & Smid, N. G.. (2010). Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.

Egberink, I. J. L., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2007). The development of a computerized adaptive test for integrity. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Edwards, M. C., Flora, D. B., & Thissen, D.. (2012). Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing With Uniform Item Exposure. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 118-141. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.660363

Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D.. (2007). Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Computer adaptive testing quality requirements. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 288-295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Adaptive orientation methods in computer adaptive testing. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 1290-1295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Personalized feedback in CAT. In . WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, Issue 3, Volume 2,174-181, July 2005.