Export 2293 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
B
Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162
Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Hare, D. R.. (2010). Assembling an Inventory of Multistage Adaptive Testing Systems. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 247-266). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B.. (2004). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multi-Stage Testing for the Uniform CPA Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon br04-01.pdf (200.51 KB)
Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Automated Simultaneous Assembly for Multistage Testing. International Journal of Testing, 5, 319-330. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_8
PDF icon br03-01.pdf (87.76 KB)
Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A.. (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2002). Fairness issues in adaptive tests with strict time limits. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon br02-01.pdf (1.26 MB)
Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.
Brossman, B. G., & Guille, R. A.. (2014). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018
Brown, J. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon br77-6.pdf (2.35 MB)
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T.. (2003). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.
Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1986). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In . In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed and pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.
Burke, M. J,, Normand, J., & Raju, N. M.. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.
Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB)
Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.
C
Candell, G. L. (1988). Application of appropriateness measurement to a problem in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
Carey, P. A. (1999). The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Carlson, R. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.
Carlson, S. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.
Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.
Cella, D., & Nowinski, C. J.. (2002). Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S10-7. presented at the Dec.
Chae, S. (1995). Item equivalence from paper-and-pencil to computer adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Chajewski, M., & Lewis, C.. (2009). Optimizing item exposure control algorithms for polytomous computerized adaptive tests with restricted item banks. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09chajewski.pdf (922.78 KB)
Chajewski, M., & Harnisher, J.. (2017). Considerations in Performance Evaluations of Computerized Formative Assessments. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-01.pdf (251.46 KB)
Chang, H. - H. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB)
Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2017). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
Chang, C. - H. (2004). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.
PDF icon ch04-01.pdf (180.23 KB)
Chang, H. - H., Chang, S., & Ansley,. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.
Chang, H. - H., & Guo, R.. (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1997). Multi-stage CAT with stratified design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
Chang, S. - W. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
Chang, I. Y. (2004). Sequential estimation in variable length computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 249-264.
Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2003). Assessing CAT security breaches by the item pooling index. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Pages