Export 276 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
. (2004). . (1984).
An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
. (2002). ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB)An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB) . (1969).
A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2 (3).
. (2003). be03-03.pdf (436.24 KB)A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
. (2002). be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB)Features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In . D. G. Englehard (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice. Volume 6.
. (2005). Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 424-31.
. (2010). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.
. (1980). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
. (1981). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
. (1986). . (1988).
Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).
. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).
. (1977). Functioning and validity of a computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A CAT). Depression and Anxiety, 25, E182-E194.
. (2008). A generalization of sequential analysis to decision making with tailored testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Military Testing Association. Oklahoma City OK.
. (1978). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600. presented at the Aug.
. (1997). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
. (2017). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (2019). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.
. (1997). Illustration of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Boston MA.
. (1990). Implementation of a Model Adaptive Testing System at an Armed Forces Entrance and Examination Station. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). re77216.pdf (312.3 KB)Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test® computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07rudner.pdf (134.53 KB)Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1989). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.
. (2007). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.
. (2000). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.
. (1974). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1973). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.
. (1989). An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 624-638. doi:10.1177/0146621618824856
. (2019). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.
. (1997). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.
. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.
. (2007). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.
. (1998). . (2011).
. (2011).
Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
. (2017). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
. (2014). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). re03-01.pdf (134.72 KB)Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment. Aachen, Germany.
. (2001). . (2009).
Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28-II42.
. (2000). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.
. (2005). . (2000).
Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2020). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (2006). La distribution dchantillonnage en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux rgles darrt : selon lerreur type et selon le nombre ditems administrs [Sampling distribution of the proficiency estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping.. Doctoral thesis, Montreal: University of Montreal.
. (2000). La simulation d’un test adaptatif basé sur le modèle de Rasch [Simulation of a Rasch-based adaptive test]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation.
. (2002). ra02-04.pdf (29.76 KB)