Export 179 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is M [Clear All Filters]
A New Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Simultaneously Diagnosing Skills and Misconceptions. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
. (2020). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101
. (2023). Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version. Psychological Assessment, 19, 14-24. presented at the Mar.
. (2007). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
. (1984). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.
. (2007). . (2002).
Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.
. (2005). . (2005).
Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.
. (2001). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.
. (2007). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.
. (2003). Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.
. (2009). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.
. (2003). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.
. (2008). . (2000).
Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.
. (2003). bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95-108.
. (2007). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
. (2008). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.
. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.
. (2009). . (1998).
Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 81-104.
. (2008). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
. (2002). Considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 138-56.
. (2009). Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Medical Care, 44, S39-49. presented at the Nov.
. (2006). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB)Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.
. (2004). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2012). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.
. (2006). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB)Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.
. (2007). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.
. (2005). . (2004).
A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Verschoor Radtke Eggen Test Assmebly Model.pdf (339.24 KB)Multi-stage Testing for a Multi-disciplined End-of primary-school Test . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C5ys178p_Wl9eemQuIsI56IxDTck2z8P
. (2017). An Empirical Simulation Study Using mstR for MST Designs. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Using Determinantal Point Processes for Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GkJkKTEFWK3srDX8TL4ra_Xbsliemu1R
. (2017). Multi-stage Testing for a Multi-disciplined End-of primary-school Test . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C5ys178p_Wl9eemQuIsI56IxDTck2z8P
. (2017). A Paradigm for Multinational Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Zara Multinational Adaptive Testing.pdf (175.98 KB)Item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items--approximation methods for scale scores. In Test scoring (pp. 289-315). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2001). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.
. (2006). Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Bontempo - CAT for Diagnostic Information.pdf (283 KB)Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.
. (2004). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing
. (2017). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (2019). A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Verschoor Radtke Eggen Test Assmebly Model.pdf (339.24 KB)Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101
. (2016). Colvin FINAL.pdf (630.27 KB)Scripted On-the-fly Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wKuAstITLXo6BM4APf2mPsth1BymNl-y
. (2017). Using Determinantal Point Processes for Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GkJkKTEFWK3srDX8TL4ra_Xbsliemu1R
. (2017). MHK-MST Design and the Related Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). An Empirical Simulation Study Using mstR for MST Designs. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
. (2020). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.
. (2006). Development of an index of physical functional health status in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 655-65. presented at the May.
. (2002). Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.
. (2007).