Kingsbury, G. G. (1984). Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change in instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univerity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Kalisch, S. J. (1974). The comparison of two tailored testing models and the effects of the models variables on actual loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

Kunce, C. S. (1979). The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2009). Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Karino, C. A., Costa, D. R., & Laros, J. A.. (2009). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S.. (1978). Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2007). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1986). Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schneider, R. J., McLellan, R. A., Kantrowitz, T. M., Houston, J. S., & Borman, W. C.. (2009). Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2010). Detecting Person Misfit in Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 315-329). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 201-219). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In . W. J. van der Linden, and C. A. W. Glas (Editors). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1999). Developing computerized adaptive tests for school children. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 93-115). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Wendt, A., Kao, S., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Developing item variants: An empirical study. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kubinger, K. D. (1989). Die Optimierung der Mebgenauikeit beim branched adaptiven Testen [Optimization of measurement precision for branched-adaptive testing. In . K. D. Kubinger (Ed.), Moderne Testtheorie Ein Abrib samt neusten Beitrgen [Modern test theory Overview and new issues] (pp. 187-218). Weinhem, Germany: Beltz.

Imai, S., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Kikuchi, K., Akagi, Y., Nakasono, H., et al.. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P. Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2007). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Finkelman, M., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2009). Item selection and hypothesis testing for the adaptive measurement of change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2003). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In A. Okada, Shigenasu, K., Kano, Y., & Meulman, J., New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.

Kalisch, S. J. (1980). A model for computerized adaptive testing related to instructional situations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 101-119). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Dowling, C. E., & Kaluscha, R.. (1995). Prerequisite relationships for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. In . Greer, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of AIED'95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington, DC, AACE 43-50.

Kubinger, K. D. (1988). On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.

Frey, A., Seitz, N. - N., & Kröhne, U.. (2013). Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.

Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Vicino, F. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Validation of the experimental CAT-ASVAB system. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Krass, I. A. (1998). Application of direct optimization for on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Krass, I. A. (2001). Application of score information for CAT pool development and its connection with "likelihood test information. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1989). Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1990). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.

Krass, I. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Automated flawed item detection and graphical item used in on-line calibration of CAT-ASVAB. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Krass, I. A., & Williams, B.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Krass, I. A. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1988). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1985). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1988). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Montowidlo, S. J., Drasgow, F., Foster, L., & Kubisiak, U. C.. (1998). Computerized adaptive rating scales that measure contextual performance. In Paper presented at the 3th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas TX.

de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.

Parshall, C., Davey, T., Spray, J., & Kalohn, J.. (1999). Computerized testing – Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2011). Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Dennis, M. L., Funk, R., Titus, J., Riley, B. B., Hosman, S., & Kinne, S.. (2008). Developing a progressive approach to using the GAIN in order to reduce the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN short screener, Quick and computer adaptive testing. In Joint Meeting on Adolescent Treatment Effectiveness . presented at the 2008, Washington D.C., USA.

Kalohn, J. C., & Spray, J. A.. (1998). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., Schulz, M., & Fleer, J. P.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: 3-PLM vs. 1PLM (and UIRT versus MIRT). In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis, MN.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kocher, A. T. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stability and accuracy of flexilevel tests. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 03/1074, Chicago IL.

Kirisci, L. (1992). Estimation of ability level by using only observable quantities in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting if the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Wang, T., & Kolen, M. J.. (1997). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Levine, M. V., & Krass, I. A.. (1999). Formula score and direct optimization algorithms in CAT ASVAB on-line calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the *?*.

Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ