Export 235 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is D [Clear All Filters]
Adaptive assessment and training using the neighbourhood of knowledge states. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montral, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 578-587.
. (1996). . (2000).
ALPHATAB: A lookup table for Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 326.
. (1985). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In , Computer-based testing. Mahwah, N.J., USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. Philadelphia PA.
. (1998). An analysis of CAT-ASVAB scores in the Marine Corps JPM data (CRM- 91-161). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analysis.
. (1991). Application of an IRT ideal point model to computer adaptive assessment of job performance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organization Psychology. Dallas TX.
. (1998). . (1992).
Applying specific information item selection to a passage-based test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA, April.
. (2000). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-939.
. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.
. (2005). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.
. (2003). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). a-stratified computerized adaptive testing with unequal item exposure across strata. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ATS-PD: An Adaptive Testing System for Psychological Disorders. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 792-815. doi:10.1177/0013164416652188
. (2017). Balancing Flexible Constraints and Measurement Precision in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 629-648. doi:10.1177/0013164411431838
. (2012). Bayesian Perspectives on Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.
. (2005). Best test design and self-tailored testing (Research Memorandum No 19). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education, Statistical Laboratory.
. (1975). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
. (2020). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.
. (2003). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.
. (1991). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.
. (2006). Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09diao.pdf (341.8 KB)A comparison of computer adaptive test administration methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
. (1993). . (2010).
A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802
. (2010). A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). bo03-02.pdf (404.34 KB)A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434
. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
. (2013). Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296
. (2012). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
. (2014). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB)A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB)A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2002). A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804
. (2010). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
. (2003). debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB)A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.
. (1989). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.
. (1992). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.
. (1992). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.
. (1981). . (1994).
A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 384-393.
. (2003). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1974). de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB)Computer-adaptive testing of listening comprehension: A blueprint of CAT Development. The Language Teacher Online 21, no. 10. .
. (1997). Computer-based adaptive testing models for the Air Force technical training environment: Phase I: Development of a computerized measurement system for Air Force technical Training. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1-86 (MS No. 882). AFHRL Technical Report 74-48.
. (1974). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
. (2006). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1985). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (1988). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (1988). A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.
. (2004). Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive rating scales that measure contextual performance. In Paper presented at the 3th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas TX.
. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three parameter model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3148.
. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.
. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 388-401. doi:10.1177/0146621618798665
. (2019). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.
. (2008).