Bergstrom, B. (1992). Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Weiss, D. J., & Betz, N. E.. (1973). Ability measurement: Conventional or adaptive? (Research Report 73-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Wainer, H.,, Lewis, C., Kaplan, B,, & Braswell, J.. (1990). An adaptive algebra test: A testlet-based, hierarchically structured test with validity-based scoring. ETS Technical Report 90-92.

Bock, B. D.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444.

Raîche, G., Blais, J. G., & Magis, D.. (2007). Adaptive estimators of trait level in adaptive testing: Some proposals. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Bengs, D., Brefeld, U., & Kröhne, U.. (2018). Adaptive Item Selection Under Matroid Constraints. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(2), 15-36. doi:10.7333/1808-0602015

Bengs, D., Brefeld, U., & Kröhne, U.. (2018). Adaptive Item Selection Under Matroid Constraints. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(2), 15-36. doi:10.7333/1808-0602015

Brown, J. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wang, T., Yi, Q., Ban, J. C., Harris, D. J., & Hanson, B. A.. (1999). Adjusting "scores" from a CAT following successful item challenges. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.

Tatsuoka, K. K., Tatsuoka, M. M., & Baillie, R.. (1984). Application of adaptive testing to a fraction test (Research Report 84-3-NIE). Urbana IL: Univerity of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.

Garrison, W. M., & Baumgarten, B. S.. (1986). An application of computer adaptive testing with communication handicapped examinees. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 23-35.

Bejar, I. I. (1977). Applications of adaptive testing in measuring achievement and performance. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. .

Gafni, N., Cohen, Y., Roded, K., Baumer, M., & Moshinsky, A.. (2009). Applications of CAT in admissions to higher education in Israel: Twenty-two years of experience. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Baghi, H., Gabrys, R., & Ferrara, S.. (1991). Applications of computer-adaptive testing in Maryland. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Hare, D. R.. (2010). Assembling an Inventory of Multistage Adaptive Testing Systems. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 247-266). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Wang, T., Fan, M. Yi, Q., Ban, J. C., & Zhu, D.. (2000). Assembling parallel item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Stahl, J. A.. (1992). Assessing existing item bank depth for computer adaptive testing. In ERIC Document No. TM022404.

Garrison, W. M., & Baumgarten, B. S.. (1982). Assessing mathematics achievement with a tailored testing program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T.. (2003). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.

Bontempo, B., Julian, E. R., & Gorham, J. L.. (1997). Assessing speededness in variable-length computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Baumer, M., Roded, K., & Gafni, N.. (2009). Assessing the equivalence of Internet-based vs. paper-and-pencil psychometric tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Donadello, I., Spoto, A., Sambo, F., Badaloni, S., Granziol, U., & Vidotto, G.. (2017). ATS-PD: An Adaptive Testing System for Psychological Disorders. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 792-815. doi:10.1177/0013164416652188

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Automated Simultaneous Assembly for Multistage Testing. International Journal of Testing, 5, 319-330. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_8

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B.. (2004). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multi-Stage Testing for the Uniform CPA Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162

Watts, K.,, Baddeley, A. D., & Williams, M.. (1982). Automated tailored testing using Raven’s Matrices and the Mill Hill vocabulary tests. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 331-344.

Bradlow, E. T., Weiss, R. E., & Cho, M.. (1998). Bayesian identification of outliers in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 910-919.

Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H.,, & Wang, X.. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets . Psychometrika, 64, 153-168.

Wainer, H.,, Lewis, C., Kaplan, B., & Braswell, J.. (1991). Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (1977). Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.

Rocklin, T. R., Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T. L.. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T. Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.

Stahl, J., Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1999). CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G.. (2003). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.

Steele, J. A., Binnie, C. A., & Cooper, W. A.. (1978). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M.. (1997). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.

Shudong Wang,, Hong Jiao,, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J.. (2008). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1991). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

Schaeffer, G., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Masters, J. S., Muckle, T. J., & Bontempo, B.. (2009). Comparing methods to recalibrate drifting items in computerized adaptive testing. In American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.

Waters, C. J., & Bayroff, A. G.. (1971). A comparison of computer-simulated conventional and branching tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 125-136.

Bejar, I. I. (1977). A comparison of conventional and adaptive achievement testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (2003). A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434

Bryson, R. (1971). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.

Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A.. (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.