Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Trollip, S. R., & Anderson, R. I.. (1982). An adaptive Private Pilot Certification Exam. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.

Adams, R. J. (1987). Adaptive testing, information, and the partial credit model. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Center for the Study of Higher Education.

Dorronsoro, J. R., Santa-Cruz, C., Rubio Franco, V. J., & Aguado García, D.. (2000). Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima información para la selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado. Psicothema, 12, 12-14.

Allred, L. A., & Green, B. F.. (1984). Analysis of experimental CAT ASVAB data. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

van der Linden, W. J., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2006). Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Hare, D. R.. (2010). Assembling an Inventory of Multistage Adaptive Testing Systems. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 247-266). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J. J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Automated Simultaneous Assembly for Multistage Testing. International Journal of Testing, 5, 319-330. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_8

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B.. (2004). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multi-Stage Testing for the Uniform CPA Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Barrada, J. R., Abad, F. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2009). Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 21, 313-320. presented at the May.

Morgan, D. L., Way, W. D., & Augemberg, K. E.. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.

Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Andres, P. L., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Tonidandel, S., Quiñones, M. A., & Adams, A. A.. (2002). Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers’ reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 320-332.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Ling, G., Attali, Y., Finn, B., & Stone, E. A.. (2017). Is a Computerized Adaptive Test More Motivating Than a Fixed-Item Test?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0146621617707556

Albano, A. D., Cai, L., Lease, E. M., & McConnell, S. R.. (2019). Computerized Adaptive Testing in Early Education: Exploring the Impact of Item Position Effects on Ability Estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 437-451. doi:10.1111/jedm.12215

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Berliner, N.. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652

Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Adema, J. J. (1990). The construction of customized two-staged tests, 27, 241-253.

Arbiyah, N. (2017). Construction of Gratitude Scale Using Polytomous Item Response Theory Model. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pHhO4cq2-wh24ht3nBAoXNHv7234_mjH

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L.. (2011). Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Abad, F. J., Olea, J., Aguado, D., Ponsoda, V., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Deterioro de parámetros de los ítems en tests adaptativos informatizados: estudio con eCAT [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT]. Psicothema, 22, 340-7.

Abad, F. J., Olea, J., Aguado, D., Ponsoda, V., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Deterioro de parámetros de los ítems en tests adaptativos informatizados: estudio con eCAT [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT]. Psicothema, 22, 340-7.

Way, W. D., Steffen, M., & Anderson, G. S.. (1998). Developing, maintaining, and renewing the item inventory to support computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the colloquium. Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments, Philadelphia PA.

Han, K. T., Dimitrov, D. M., & Al-Mashary, F.. (2019). Developing Multistage Tests Using D-Scoring Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 988-1008. doi:10.1177/0013164419841428

Anatchkova, M. D., Saris-Baglama, R. N., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2009). Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Chie, W. C., Conroy, T., Costantini, A., et al.. (2010). Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension. Quality of Life Research , 20, 479-490.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and inverse problems of item pool design for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Lau, C. - M. A.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: UIRT versus MIRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Arrowwood, V. E. (1994). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.

Chen, S. - Y., & Ankenmann, R. D.. (2004). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.

Allen, D. D., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.

Anastasi, A. (1953). An empirical study of the applicability of sequential analysis to item selection, 13, 3-13.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Auger, R. (1989). Étude de praticabilité du testing adaptatif de maîtrise des apprentissages scolaires au Québec : une expérimentation en éducation économique secondaire 5. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. [In French].

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E.. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Walker, C. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Ackerman, T. A.. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing (ACT Research Report series 99-5). Iowa City IA: ACT, Inc.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (2001). The FastTEST Professional Testing System, Version 1.6 [Computer software]. St. Paul MN: Author.

Imai, S., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Kikuchi, K., Akagi, Y., Nakasono, H., et al.. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chen, Y. - Y., & Ankenmann, R. D.. (2004). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.