Export 2193 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
A
Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.
Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Lau, C. - M. A.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: UIRT versus MIRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
Abdullah, S. C., & Cooley, R. E.. (2000). Using constraints to develop and deliver adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Computer-Assisted Testing Conference.
PDF icon ab00-01.pdf (45.6 KB)
van Abswoude, A. A. H., Vermunt, J. K., Hemker, B. T., & van der Ark, A. L.. (2004). Mokken Scale Analysis Using Hierarchical Clustering Procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 332-354. doi:10.1177/0146621604265510
PDF icon v15n1p013.pdf (1.06 MB)
Ackerman, T. A. (1987). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.
Adams, R. J. (1987). Adaptive testing, information, and the partial credit model. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Center for the Study of Higher Education.
Allred, L. A., & Green, B. F.. (1984). Analysis of experimental CAT ASVAB data. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.
Anderson, D. (1999). Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ar03-01.pdf (394.73 KB)
Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350
Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ar03-02.pdf (417.41 KB)
Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J. J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.
PDF icon ar03-03.pdf (206.25 KB)
Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Berliner, N.. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652
Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J.. (2004). A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ar04-01.pdf (287.44 KB)
Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.
Arrowwood, V. E. (1994). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.
B
Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Variable-length CATs are not biased. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09babcock.pdf (280.59 KB)
Baek, S. G. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model for attitude measurement. In . M. Wilson, G. Engelhard Jr and K. Draney (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, volume 4. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Baek, S. G. (1995). Computerized adaptive attitude testing using the partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 55(7-A), 1922 (UMI No. AAM9430378).
Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Baghi, H., Gabrys, R., & Ferrara, S.. (1991). Applications of computer-adaptive testing in Maryland. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
Ban, J. C., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2000). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ba00-01.pdf (656.37 KB)
Ban, J., Wang, T., & Yi, Q.. (1999). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
Ban, J., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D.. (2001). Data sparseness and online pretest calibration/scaling methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle.
Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Multiple maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the SMABS-EAM Conference. Budapest, Hungary.
PDF icon ba09007.pdf (444.91 KB)
Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Test overlap rate and item exposure rate as indicators of test security in CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09barrada.pdf (260.26 KB)
Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.
PDF icon ba07014.pdf (398.44 KB)
Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2009). Multiple Maximum Exposure Rates in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 58-73. doi:10.1177/0146621608315329

Pages