Nydick, S. W., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). A hybrid simulation procedure for the development of CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Nydick, S. W. (2014). The Sequential Probability Ratio Test and Binary Item Response Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 203-230. doi:10.3102/1076998614524824

Núñez, R. M. N., & Pina, J. A. L.. (2006). Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.

Novick, M. R. (1969). Bayesian methods in psychological testing (Research Bulletin RB-69-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Novick, M. R. (1980). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.

Norris, J. M., Kenyon, D. M., & Malabonga, V.. (2001). Concerns with computerized adaptive oral proficiency assessment. A commentary on "Comparing examinee attitudes Toward computer-assisted and other oral proficient assessments": Response to the Norris Commentary. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 95-108.

Nogami, Y., & Hayashi, N.. (2010). A Japanese Adaptive Test of English as a Foreign Language: Developmental and Operational Aspects. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 191-211). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Nisbet, J., Adams, M., & Arthur, J.. (1980). A simple form of tailored testing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 301-303.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Nicewander, W. A., Chang, H. S., & Doody, E. N.. (1981). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1998). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Nicewander, W. A. (2003). Issues in maintaining scale consistency for the CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.

Nering, M., Thompson, T. D., & Davey, T.. (1997). Simulation of realistic ability vectors. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg TN.

Nering, M. L. (1996). The effects of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T.. (1998). A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T.. (1998). A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Nering, M. L. (1997). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.

National-Council-of-State-Boards-of-Nursing,. (1991). A psychometric comparison of computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the national RN licensure examination. Chicago IL: Author, Unpublished report.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.