Export 148 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is H [Clear All Filters]
. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.
. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.
. (1989). Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.
. (2004). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152
. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.
. (1999). Item nonresponse: Occurrence, causes and imputation of missing answers to test items. (M and T Series No 32). Leiden: DSWO Press.
. (2008). Preparing the implementation of computerized adaptive testing for high-stakes examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.
. (2001). Validity issues in computer-based testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 16-25.
. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).
v17n12.pdf (296.59 KB). (2016). On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0146621615611633
. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
. (2018). Factors Affecting the Classification Accuracy and Average Length of a Variable-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Test. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1802-060101
. (2009). Practical issues concerning the application of the DINA model to CAT data. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09huebner.pdf (207.62 KB). (2018). A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289
. (1966). Programmed testing in the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
. (1996). A content-balanced adaptive testing algorithm for computer-based training systems. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montr�al, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 306-314.
. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers and Education, 52, 53-67.
. (2000). Estimating Item Parameters from Classical Indices for Item Pool Development with a Computerized Classification Test. (No. Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc.
. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552
. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642
. (2017). Using Bayesian Decision Theory in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2015). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Higher Order DINA Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 125–143. doi:10.1111/jedm.12069
. (1998). CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
. (2019). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Non-Compensatory Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 464-480. doi:10.1177/0146621618800280
. (1988). The development and evaluation of a microcomputerized adaptive placement testing system for college mathematics. In Paper(s) presented at the annual meeting(s) of the American Educational Research Association. 1986 (San Francisco CA) and 1987 (Washington DC).
. (1974). A Bayesian approach in sequential testing. In American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1974, Chicago IL.
. (1995). Using simulation to select an adaptive testing strategy: An item bank evaluation program. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.
. (1996). The effects of methods of theta estimation, prior distribution, and number of quadrature points on CAT using the graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York NY.
. (1979). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing. Programmed Larning and Educational Technology, 16, 164-169.
. (1977). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing strategies. In Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing. University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
. (1980). A validity study of an adaptive test of reading comprehension. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 57-67). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
ho80-01.pdf (675.09 KB). (1999). Benefits from computerized adaptive testing as seen in simulation studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 91-98.
. (1995). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
. (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.
. (2012). A Mixture Rasch Model–Based Computerized Adaptive Test for Latent Class Identification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 469-493. doi:10.1177/0146621612450068
. (1970). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1992). Effects of feedback during self-adapted testing on estimates of ability. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1999). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
. (2004). The AMC Linear Disability Score project in a population requiring residential care: psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Aug 3.
. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.
. (1991). A simulation study of some simple approaches to the study of DIF for CATs. Internal memorandum, Educational Testing Service.
. (2007). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Motivation Items: Administration Mode Effects and a Comparison With Short Forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429. doi:10.1177/0146621606297314
. (2005). A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.
. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12
Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits.pdf (518.72 KB). (2005). A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268
. (2001). Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.
. (2006). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.
. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.
. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
. (1996). Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative ASVAB testing concepts at MET sites. Interim report to Defense Manpower Data Center. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI, Inc.
. (2002). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.
. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
. (2005). Design and evaluation of an XML-based platform-independent computerized adaptive testing system. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 230-237.
. (1989). A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1993). Item Calibration: Medium-of-administration effect on computerized adaptive scores (TR-93-9). Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1994). A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).
v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)