Export 160 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is C  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Curran, L. T., & Wise, L. L.. (1994). Evaluation and implementation of CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles.
Culbertson, M. J. (2016). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment: The State of the Field. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 3-21. doi:10.1177/0146621615590401
PDF icon v3n1p065.pdf (543.67 KB)
Cudeck, R. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.
Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., & Kehoe, J.. (1977). TAILOR: A FORTRAN procedure for interactive tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 767-769.
PDF icon v04n2p157.pdf (650.25 KB)
Crotts, K. M., Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G., & Li, X.. (2013). Estimating Measurement Precision in Reduced-Length Multi-Stage Adaptive Testing . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(4), 67-87. doi:10.7333/1309-0104067
Cronbach, L. J. (1966). New light on test strategy from decision theory. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.). Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
Croll, P. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing system design: Preliminary design considerations (Tech. Report 82-52). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 495).
Croll, P. R., & Urry, V. W.. (1975). Tailored testing: Maximizing validity and utility for job selection. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Toronto. Canada.
Crabbe, M., & Vandebroek, M.. (2014). Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Random Weights Linear Logistic Test Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-431. doi:10.1177/0146621614533987
Coyle, J. (2001). Final answer?. American School Board Journal, 188, 24-26.
Cox, M. A. A. (2014). A Numerical Investigation of the Recovery of Point Patterns With Minimal Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 329-335. doi:10.1177/0146621613516186
Cowden, D. J. (1946). An application of sequential sampling to testing students. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41, 547-556.
Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09costa.pdf (530.39 KB)
Cory, C. H. (1976). Using computerized tests to add new dimensions to the measurement of abilities which are important for on-job performance: An exploratory study. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 64-74). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon co75-01.pdf (631.79 KB)
Cordova, M. J. (1998). Applications of network flows to computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation, Rutgers Center for Operations Research (RUTCOR), Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ.
Cordova, M. J. (1997). Optimization methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ.
PDF icon co03-01.pdf (606.41 KB)
Conrad, K. J., Riley, B. B., & Dennis, M. L.. (2007). The use of computerized adaptive testing to assess psychopathology using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs. American Evaluation Association. presented at the November, Portland, OR USA: American Evaluation Association .
Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A.. (2004). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
PDF icon Colvin FINAL.pdf (630.27 KB)
Collins, J. A., Greer, J. E., & Huang, S. X.. (1996). Adaptive assessment using granularity hierarchies and Bayesian nets. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montréal, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 569-577.
Collins, J. A. (1996). Adaptive testing with granularity. Masters thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science.
Cliff, N. A. (1975). A basic test theory generalizable to tailored testing (Technical Report No 1). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
PDF icon v03n4p495.pdf (1.5 MB)
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1977). An empirical evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon cl77048.pdf (779.84 KB)
Cliff, N. A. (1976). Incomplete orders and computerized testing. In C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 18-23). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon cl75-01.pdf (372.58 KB)
Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A.. (1969). An exploratory study of programmed tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 345-360.
Claudio, M. J. C. (1998). Applications of network flows to computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 0855.
Clark, C. K. (1976). Proceedings of the first conference on computerized adaptive testing. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon cl76-01.pdf (7.42 MB)
Cizek, G. J. (2004). Protecting the integrity of computer-adaptive licensure tests: Results of a legal challenge. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ci04-01.pdf (190.38 KB)
Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Luecht, R.. (2006). How Big Is Big Enough? Sample Size Requirements for CAST Item Parameter Estimation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 241-255. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_5
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2010). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.
Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801
Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644-645. presented at the Nov 1.
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2011). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338
Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.
Choi, S. W., Moellering, K. T., Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2016). Optimal Reassembly of Shadow Tests in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 469-485. doi:10.1177/0146621616654597
Choe, E., Williams, B., & Lee, S. - H.. (2017). Scripted On-the-fly Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wKuAstITLXo6BM4APf2mPsth1BymNl-y

Pages