Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Test overlap rate and item exposure rate as indicators of test security in CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Laurier, M. (1999). Testing adaptatif et évaluation des processus cognitifs. In . C. Depover and B. Noël (Éds) : L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs - Modèles, pratiques et contextes. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université.

Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Thissen, D., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,, Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z.. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Eggen, T. (2010). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Laurier, M. (1993). Un test adaptatif en langue seconde : la perception des apprenants. In . R.Hivon (Éd.),L’évaluation des apprentissages. Sherbrooke : Éditions du CRP.

Chang, H. - H. (2004). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.

Sheng, Y., Flournoy, N., & Osterlind, S. J.. (2007). Up-and-down procedures for approximating optimal designs using person-response functions. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

De Beer, M. (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Lai, H., Alves, C., & Gierl, M. J.. (2009). Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Millan, E., Trella, M., Perez-de-la-Cruz, J. - L., & Conejo, R.. (2000). Using Bayesian Networks in Computerized Adaptive Tests. In . M. Ortega and J. Bravo (Eds.),Computers and Education in the 21st Century. Kluwer, pp. 217228.

Cory, C. H. (1976). Using computerized tests to add new dimensions to the measurement of abilities which are important for on-job performance: An exploratory study. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 64-74). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Raîche, G.. (1994). Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).

Thompson, N. A. (2009). Utilizing the generalized likelihood ratio as a termination criterion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Vicino, F. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Validation of the experimental CAT-ASVAB system. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Steinberg, L., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H.,. (1990). Validity. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Olsen, J. B., & Bunderson, C. V.. (2007). Validity and decision issues in selecting a CAT measurement model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Hornke, L. F., & Sauter, M. B.. (1980). A validity study of an adaptive test of reading comprehension. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 57-67). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Drasgow, F. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P. Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Wise, S. L., Freeman, S. A., Finney, S. J., Enders, C. K., & Severance, D. D.. (1997). The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). Accuracy of reading and mathematics ability estimates under the shadow-test constraint MCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Li, Y. H., & Yu, N. Y.. (2002). Accuracy of the ability estimate and the item exposure rate under multidimensional adaptive testing with item constraints. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Wang, X. B., & Wiley, A.. (2004). Achieving accuracy of retest calibration for a national CAT placement examination with a restricted test length. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.  . (2001). Adaptation of a-stratified method in variable length computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Morin, M. (2017). Adapting Linear Models for Optimal Test Design to More Complex Test Specifications. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Segall, D. O. (2003). An adaptive exposure control algorithm for computerized adaptive testing using a sharing item response theory model. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

van Buuren, N., Straat, H., Eggen, T., & Fox, J. - P.. (2017). Adaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning with a Network Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Schwall, A., & Sinar, E.. (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

McBride, J. R. (1978). An adaptive test designed for paper-and-pencil testing. In Presentation to the convention of the Western Psychological Association. San Francisco, CA.

Yan, D., Lewis, C., & Stocking, M.. (1998). Adaptive testing without IRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Schouwstra, S. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Zhu, D., & M., F.. (1999). Adjusting computer adaptive test starting points to conserve item pool. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

Wang, T., Yi, Q., Ban, J. C., Harris, D. J., & Hanson, B. A.. (1999). Adjusting "scores" from a CAT following successful item challenges. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

Zara, A. (1997). Administering and scoring the computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Green, B. F. (1997). Alternate methods of scoring computer-based adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Robin, F. (1999). Alternative item selection strategies for improving test security and pool usage in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education< Montreal. Canada.

Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. Philadelphia PA.

Maslak, A., & Pozdniakov, S.. (2017). Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (1998). Application of an IRT ideal point model to computer adaptive assessment of job performance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organization Psychology. Dallas TX.

Krass, I. A. (1998). Application of direct optimization for on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Krass, I. A. (2001). Application of score information for CAT pool development and its connection with "likelihood test information. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Reckase, M. D. (1974). An application of the Rasch simple logistic model to tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.. St. Loius MO.

Baghi, H., Gabrys, R., & Ferrara, S.. (1991). Applications of computer-adaptive testing in Maryland. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O. (1997). Applications of multidimensional adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Thompson, T. D., & Davey, T.. (2000). Applying specific information item selection to a passage-based test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA, April.

Wang, T., Fan, M. Yi, Q., Ban, J. C., & Zhu, D.. (2000). Assembling parallel item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2003). Assessing CAT security breaches by the item pooling index. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Stahl, J. A.. (1992). Assessing existing item bank depth for computer adaptive testing. In ERIC Document No. TM022404.

Garrison, W. M., & Baumgarten, B. S.. (1982). Assessing mathematics achievement with a tailored testing program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Bontempo, B., Julian, E. R., & Gorham, J. L.. (1997). Assessing speededness in variable-length computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Weissman, A. (2003). Assessing the efficiency of item selection in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1989). Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1990). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.

Yi, Q., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). a-stratified CAT design with content-blocking. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. King of Prussia, PA.