Export 231 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is E  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
E
Steffen, M., & Liu, M.. (1998). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Thompson, N., & Stoeger, J.. (2017). Evaluation of Parameter Recovery, Drift, and DIF with CAT Data. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F7HCZWD28Q97sCKFIJB0Yps0H66NPeKq
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.
Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Rudner, L. M. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB)
Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon bo01-01.pdf (324.67 KB)
Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2001). An examination of item selection rules by stratified CAT designs integrated with content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon le01-01.pdf (295.52 KB)
Swygert, K. (1998). An examination of item-level response times from an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Urbana IL.
PDF icon daxx-01.pdf (652.37 KB)
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Expected losses for individuals in Computerized Mastery Testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
Potenza, M. (1994). The exploration of an alternative method for scoring computer adaptive tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska.
Dai, B., Zhang, M., & Li, G.. (2016). Exploration of Item Selection in Dual-Purpose Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Based on the RRUM. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 625-640. doi:10.1177/0146621616666008
Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.
Bayroff, A. G., & Seeley, L. C.. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).
Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A.. (1969). An exploratory study of programmed tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 345-360.
Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D.. (2007). Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07edwards.pdf (211.05 KB)
Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL. USA.
PDF icon lu03-04.pdf (115.22 KB)
Frick, T. W., Plew, G. T., & Luk, H. - K.. (1989). EXSPRT: An expert systems approach to computer-based adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. San Francisco.).
Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

Pages