Export 231 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is E  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
S
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
Steffen, M., & Liu, M.. (1998). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Stoloff, P. H. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.
Swygert, K. (1998). An examination of item-level response times from an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Urbana IL.
Sykes, R., & Ito, K.. (1995). Estimation of item difficulty from restricted CAT calibration samples. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education in San Francisco.
Sympson, J. B. (1980). Estimating the reliability of adaptive tests from a single test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston.
PDF icon sy81-01.pdf (7.42 MB)
Sympson, J. B. (1977). Estimation of latent trait status in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB)
Sympson, J. B. (1975). Evaluating the results of computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 26-31. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon sy75-01.pdf (448.16 KB)
T
Thomasson, G. L. (2003). Evaluating stability of online item calibrations under varying conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Thompson, N., & Stoeger, J.. (2017). Evaluation of Parameter Recovery, Drift, and DIF with CAT Data. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F7HCZWD28Q97sCKFIJB0Yps0H66NPeKq
Thompson, T. (2002). Employing new ideas in CAT to a simulated reading test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon to02-01.pdf (215.33 KB)
V
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing (p. 437). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Vispoel, W., Forte, E., & Boo, J.. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
W
Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Wang, T. (1997). Essentially unbiased EAP estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
PDF icon wa97-01.pdf (224.35 KB)
Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2014). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057
Wang, T., Lau, C., & Hanson, B. A.. (1998). Essentially unbiased Bayesian estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
Wang, T., & Kolen, M. J.. (1997). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Waters, B. K. (1976). An empirical investigation of Weiss' stradaptive testing model. In . C. L. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 54-63.). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission.
PDF icon wa75-01.pdf (575.27 KB)
PDF icon v01n1p141.pdf (725.15 KB)
Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094
Wood, R. L. (1969). The efficacy of tailored testing. Educational Research, 11, 219-222.
Z
Zhang, J., & Lu, T.. (2003). Evaluating computer-based test security by generalized item overlap rates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
Zhang, J., & Chang, H.. (2005). The effectiveness of using multiple item pools in computerized adaptive testing. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education . presented at the 04/2005, Montreal, Canada.
Zwick, R. (1998). An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis: Theoretical development and application to CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Pages