Parshall, C. G., & Harmes, J. C.. (2007). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Parshall, C., Davey, T., Spray, J., & Kalohn, J.. (1999). Computerized testing – Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.

Parshall, C., Harmes, J. C., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2000). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Pashley, P.. (2002). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R.. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2017). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2001). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2002). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). A “Rearrangement Procedure” For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262

Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B.. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.

Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Padaki, M., & Natarajan, V.. (2009). An approach to implementing adaptive testing using item response theory both offline and online. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (2019). Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Glas, C. A. W., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2018). Measuring patient-reported outcomes adaptively: Multidimensionality matters!. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621617733954

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (In Press). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.