Export 148 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is H  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
H
PDF icon v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)
Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B.. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In J. R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
PDF icon v13n4p363.pdf (1.06 MB)
Hendrickson, A. B., & Kolen, M. J.. (1992). Scaling of two-stage adaptive test configurations for achievement testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME instructional module on multistage testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 44-52.
He, W., & Reckase, M. D.. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
He, Q., & Tymms, P.. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.
He, Y., Chen, P., & Li, Y.. (2020). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854
He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C.. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1994). The effects of item pool depth on the accuracy of pass/fail decisions for NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1995). An investigation of item calibration procedures for a computerized licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco, CA.
PDF icon ha05629.pdf (227.89 KB)
Hart, D. L., & Wright, B. D.. (2002). Development of an index of physical functional health status in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 655-65. presented at the May.
Harmes, J. C., Parshall, C. G., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2003). Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ha03-01.pdf (625.24 KB)
PDF icon ha01-01.pdf (405.35 KB)
Harman, H. H., Helm, C. E., & Loye, D. E.. (1968). Computer-assisted testing (Eds.). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.
Hansen, D. N. (1976). Reflections on adaptive testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 90-94). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon ha75-01.pdf (463.75 KB)
Hansen, D. N. (1969). An investigation of computer-based science testing. In . R. C. Atkinson and H. A. Wilson (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction: A book of readings. New York: Academic Press.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.
Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M.. (1997). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.
Han, K. T. (2016). Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 289-301. doi:10.1177/0146621616631317
Han, K. T., Dimitrov, D. M., & Al-Mashary, F.. (2019). Developing Multistage Tests Using D-Scoring Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 988-1008. doi:10.1177/0013164419841428
Han, K. T. (2020). Framework for Developing Multistage Testing With Intersectional Routing for Short-Length Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 87-102. doi:10.1177/0146621619837226
Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638
Han, N., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Detecting exposed test items in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ha04-01.pdf (1.22 MB)
Han, K. T. (2009). Gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing (No. RR-09-07). GMAC Research Reports. McLean, VA. USA: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
Han, K. T. (2009). A gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09han.pdf (390.32 KB)
Han, K. T. (2012). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x
Hambleton, R. K., Zaal, J. N., & Pieters, J. P. M.. (1991). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory, applications, and standards. In . R. K. Hambleton and J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing: Theory and Applications (pp. 341-366). Boston: Kluwer.
Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Impact of item quality and item bank size on the psychometric quality of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Pages