Wainer, H.,. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.

Wainer, H.,. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.

Wainer, H.,. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.

Wainer, H.,. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.

Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.

Wainer, H.,, Lewis, C., Kaplan, B., & Braswell, J.. (1991). Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.

Wainer, H.,. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Wainer, H.,, Lewis, C., Kaplan, B,, & Braswell, J.. (1990). An adaptive algebra test: A testlet-based, hierarchically structured test with validity-based scoring. ETS Technical Report 90-92.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N., Eignor, D. R., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R., et al.. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,, Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z.. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,, & Eignor, D. R.. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.