Export 227 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is I  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
B
Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
Barnard, J. J. (2022). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001
Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.
PDF icon ba09007.pdf (444.91 KB)
PDF icon be77-07.pdf (1.97 MB)
Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
C
Chae, S. (1995). Item equivalence from paper-and-pencil to computer adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q
Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2002). Identify the lower bounds for item sharing and item pooling in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
Chang, H. - H., & Guo, R.. (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chen, T., Huang, C. - Y., & Liu, C.. (2017). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
Cliff, N. A. (1976). Incomplete orders and computerized testing. In C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 18-23). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon cl75-01.pdf (372.58 KB)
PDF icon v04n2p157.pdf (650.25 KB)
D
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
Do, B. - R., Chuah, S. C., & Drasgow, F.. (2004). Item parameter recovery with adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon do04-01.pdf (378.66 KB)
Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B.. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
F
Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
Finkelman, M., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2009). Item selection and hypothesis testing for the adaptive measurement of change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09finkelman.pdf (227.83 KB)
Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038
Fischer, G. H., & Pendl, P.. (1980). Individualized testing on the basis of the Rasch model. In . In J. Th. Van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak, and D. N. M. de Gruijter (Eds.). Psychometrics for educational debates. New York: Wiley.
Flaugher, R. (2000). Item pools. In . Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
G
Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1991). Individual differences in computer adaptive testing: Anxiety, computer literacy, and satisfaction. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2005). An implemented theoretical framework for a common European foreign language adaptive assessment. In . Proceedings ICODL 2005, 3rd ternational Conference on Open and Distance Learning 'Applications of Pedagogy and Technology',339-350,Greek Open University, Patra, Greece.
Glas, C. A. W., & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1999). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.183-199). Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic.
Glas, C. A. W. (2010). Item Parameter Estimation and Item Fit Analysis. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 269-288). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Grodenchik, D. J. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B.. (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 van Groen Eggen Veldkamp Item Selection.pdf (593.82 KB)
H
Hagge, S., Woo, A., & Dickison, P.. (2011). Impact of Item Drift on Candidate Ability Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Hagge Item Drift.pdf (339.31 KB)
Hambleton, R. K., Jodoin, M., & Zenisky, A. L.. (2002). Impact of selected factors on the psychometric quality of credentialing examinations administered with a sequential testlet design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Impact of item quality and item bank size on the psychometric quality of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638
Hansen, D. N. (1969). An investigation of computer-based science testing. In . R. C. Atkinson and H. A. Wilson (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction: A book of readings. New York: Academic Press.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.
Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1995). An investigation of item calibration procedures for a computerized licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco, CA.

Pages