Export 24 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is G  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Chang, H. - H. (1995). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
PDF icon v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB)
Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. - W., Chen, J. - H., & Liu, T. - C.. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
E
Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P. Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
G
Gierl, M., & Bulut, O.. (2017). Generating Rationales to Support Formative Feedback in Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O5KDFtQlDLvhNoDr7X4JO4arpJkIHKUP
H
Han, K. T. (2009). A gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09han.pdf (390.32 KB)
Han, K. T. (2009). Gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing (No. RR-09-07). GMAC Research Reports. McLean, VA. USA: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
K
Krass, I. A. (1997). Getting more precision on computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 62nd Annual meeting of Psychometric Society. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
L
Lewy, A., & Doron, R.. (1977). Group tailored tests and some problems of their utlization. In Third international Symposium on Educational testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
M
Mills, C. N., & Steffen, M.. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 75-99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
R
Reckase, M. D. (1978). A generalization of sequential analysis to decision making with tailored testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Military Testing Association. Oklahoma City OK.
S
Samejima, F. (1976). The graded response model of latent trait theory and tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 5-17). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
T
Talento-Miller, E., & Guo, F.. (2009). Guess what? Score differences with rapid replies versus omissions on a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09talento-miller.pdf (214.05 KB)
Thomasson, G. L. (1997). The goal of equity within and between computerized adaptive tests and paper and pencil forms. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
V
Verschoor, A. (2017). Grow a Tiger out of Your CAT . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
X
Xiao, B. (1989). Golden section search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Fifth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Berkeley CA.