Export 60 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is F  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
F
Maurelli, V. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB)
Gallagher, A., Bridgeman, B., & Calahan, C.. (1999). Fairness in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2002). Fairness issues in adaptive tests with strict time limits. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon br02-01.pdf (1.26 MB)
Gershon, R. C. (2017). FastCAT – Customizing CAT Administration Rules to Increase Response Efficiency. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oPJV-x0p9hRmgJ7t6k-MCC1nAoBSFM1w
PDF icon be03-03.pdf (436.24 KB)
Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
PDF icon be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB)
Imai, S., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Kikuchi, K., Akagi, Y., Nakasono, H., et al.. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09imai.pdf (654.11 KB)
Weissman, A. (2006). A Feedback Control Strategy for Enhancing Item Selection Efficiency in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 84-99. doi:10.1177/0146621605282774
Luecht, R. M. (1994). A few more issues to consider in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Coyle, J. (2001). Final answer?. American School Board Journal, 188, 24-26.
Bejar, I. I. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Weiss, D. J. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Legg, S. M., & Buhr, D. C.. (1987). Final report: Feasibility study of a computerized test administration of the CLAST. University of Florida: Institute for Student Assessment and Evaluation.
Reckase, M. D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644-645. presented at the Nov 1.
Urry, V. W. (1976). A five-year quest: Is computerized adaptive testing feasible?. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 97-102). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon ur75-01.pdf (452.07 KB)
Potenza, M. T., & Stocking, M. L.. (1997). Flawed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 79-96.
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1986). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In . In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed and pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.
Hornke, L. F. (1979). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing. Programmed Larning and Educational Technology, 16, 164-169.
Hornke, L. F. (1977). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing strategies. In Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing. University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stocking, M. L. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Luecht, R. M. (1998). A framework for exploring and controlling risks associated with test item exposure over time. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
Thompson, N. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (2011). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.
PDF icon Thompson-Weissv16n1.pdf (191.79 KB)
Bejar, I. I. (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. In . L. E. Mancall and P. G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alternative methods (pp. 115-130. Evanston IL: The American Board of Medical Specialities.
Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ
Wise, S. L. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Wise From Reliability to Validity.pdf (619.18 KB)
Pommerich, M., & Burden, T.. (2000). From simulation to application: Examinees react to computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. New Orleans, April 2000.
Barnard, J. J. (2018). From Simulation to Implementation: Two CAT Case Studies. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 23(14). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=14
Fan, M., & Zhu.,. (2002). A further study on adjusting CAT item selection starting point for individual examinees. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).