Seguin, S. P. (1976). An exploratory studyof the efficiency of the flexilevel testing procedure. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.

Kalender, I. (2011). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.

Guo, F., & Wang, L.. (2004). Evaluating scale stability of a computer adaptive testing system (No. 05-12). McLean, VA: GMAC.

Huang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J. A.. (2000). Estimating Item Parameters from Classical Indices for Item Pool Development with a Computerized Classification Test. (No. Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc.

Stoloff, P. H. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.

Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing (ACT Research Report series 99-5). Iowa City IA: ACT, Inc.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.

Bayroff, A. G., & Seeley, L. C.. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Stocking, M., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., & Eignor, D. R.. (2002). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. MCAT Monograph Series: Association of American Medical Colleges.

Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). Evaluation plan for the computerized adaptive vocational aptitude battery (Research Report 82-1).

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.

McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.

Huang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J.. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc.

Chang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J.. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (ACT Research 2000-4). Iowa City IA, ACT, Inc.

Stoloff, P. H. (1987). Equivalent-groups versus single-group equating designs for the Accelerated CAT-ASVAB Project (Research Memorandum 87-6). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Mazzeo, J., & Harvey, A. L.. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Zenisky, A. L. (2002). An empirical investigation of selected multi-stage testing design variables on test assembly and decision accuracy outcomes for credentialing exams (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 469). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Cliff, N. A. (1976). Elements of a basic test theory generalizable to tailored testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Loyd, B. H. (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.

Jiao, H., & Lau, A. C.. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J. A.. (2000). Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Research Report 2000-8). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Pommerich, M. (2007). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., & Hessinger, J.. (2003). Effect of extra time on GRE® Quantitative and Verbal Scores (Research Report 03-13). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing service.

Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A.. (1969). An exploratory study of programmed tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 345-360.

Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

Dai, B., Zhang, M., & Li, G.. (2016). Exploration of Item Selection in Dual-Purpose Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Based on the RRUM. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 625-640. doi:10.1177/0146621616666008

Haijing, L., & Shuliang, D.. (2007). An exploration and realization of computerized adaptive testing with cognitive diagnosis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 747-753.

Bode, R. K., Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Heinemann, A. W., Shevrin, D., Von Roenn, J., & Cella, D.. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.

Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022

Wise, S. L., Finney, S. J.,, Enders, C. K., Freeman, S. A., & Severance, D. D.. (1999). Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 185-198.

Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.

Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.

Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (2003). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 24-42.

Walker, C. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Ackerman, T. A.. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

Kocalevent, R. D., Rose, M., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., et al.. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.

Cliff, N., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D. J.. (1979). Evaluation of Implied Orders as a Basis for Tailored Testing with Simulation Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(4), 495-514.

Cliff, N. A., & McCormick, D.. (1979). Evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing with simulation data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 495-514.

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.