. (1998). Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-345.
. (1998). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.
. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
. (2000). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1992). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.
. (2001). Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.
. (1993). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test of tonal memory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 111-136.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779-788.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.
. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1995). Precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis.
. (1990). MusicCAT: An adaptive testing program to assess musical ability. In Paper presented at the ADCIS 32nd International Conference. San Diego CA.
. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1997). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (1992). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1996). Effects of answer feedback and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1991). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive testing system. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.
. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1987). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
. (1999). Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 151-176). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1987). An adaptive test of musical memory: An application of item response theory to the assessment of musical ability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 79A.