Kingsbury, G. G. (1984). Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change in instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univerity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1999). Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2007). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2011). Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1990). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1985). Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change due to instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3057.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1990). Adapting adaptive testing: Using the MicroCAT Testing System in a local school district. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29 (2), 3-6.

Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ

Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1999). Developing computerized adaptive tests for school children. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 93-115). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A procedure to compare conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1989). Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Kingsbury, G. G., & et. al.,. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Item pool development and maintenance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2009). Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1988). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Kingston, N. M., & Dorans, N. J.. (1984). Item Location Effects and Their Implications for IRT Equating and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 147-154.

Kirisci, L. (1992). Estimation of ability level by using only observable quantities in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting if the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Kirisci, L., & Hsu, T. - C.. (1988). A predictive analysis approach to adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kocalevent, R. D., Rose, M., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., et al.. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1995). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using the successive intervals Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 976-990.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1989). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 335-357.

Koch, W. R., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1990). Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.

Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Koch, W. R., & G., D. B.. (1986). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using partial credit scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1985). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Kocher, A. T. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stability and accuracy of flexilevel tests. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 03/1074, Chicago IL.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kopec, J. A., Badii, M., McKenna, M., Lima, V. D., Sayre, E. C., & Dvorak, M.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.

Koppel, N. B. (2000). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.

Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J., Warejr, J., Sullivan, E., & Straus, W.. (2006). An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 715-723.

Krass, I. A. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.

Krass, I. A. (1998). Application of direct optimization for on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Krass, I. A., & Williams, B.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Krass, I. A. (1997). Getting more precision on computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 62nd Annual meeting of Psychometric Society. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

Krass, I. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Automated flawed item detection and graphical item used in on-line calibration of CAT-ASVAB. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Krass, I. A. (2001). Application of score information for CAT pool development and its connection with "likelihood test information. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Krathwohl, D. (1959). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Huyser, R. J.. (1956). The sequential item test. American Psychologist, 2, 419.

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D.. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.

Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Kreitzberg, C. B., Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L.. (1978). Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2, 319-329.

Kreitzberg, C. B. (1978). Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2 (4), 319-329.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). The null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 327-345.