Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
S
Stocking, M. L. (1997). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1993). A Method for Severely Constrained Item Selection in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(3), 277-292.
PDF icon v17n3p277.pdf (1.06 MB)
Stocking, M. L. (1996). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
Stocking, M. L. (1969). Short tailored tests (RB-69-63). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.
Stocking, M. L. (1987). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 263-277.
Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L.. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151-166.
Stocking, M. L. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED389710). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.
Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L.. (1993). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 277-292.
Stocking, M. L. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1992). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Educational Testing Service Research Report (RR-92-37): Princeton NJ.
Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (2000). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 163-182). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.
Stocking, M. L. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Report RR-88-28-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Stocking, M. L. (1993). Modern computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Joint Statistics and Psychometric Seminar. Princeton NJ.
Stillwell, D. (2017). Concerto 5 Open Source CAT Platform: From Code to Nodes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=11eu1KKILQEoK5c-CYO1P1AiJgiQxX0E0
Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G.. (2003). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.
PDF icon st03-01.pdf (392.98 KB)
Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.
Steinberg, L., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H.,. (1990). Validity. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Steffen, M., & Way, W. D.. (1999). Test-taking strategies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Steffen, M., & Liu, M.. (1998). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Steffen, M. (1999). Test-taking strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2011). Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459
Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2007). Adaptive testing with the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07stark.pdf (144.15 KB)
Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2006). Multistage Testing: Widely or Narrowly Applicable?. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 257-260. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_6
Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (1998). Application of an IRT ideal point model to computer adaptive assessment of job performance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organization Psychology. Dallas TX.
Stahl, J., Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1999). CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.
Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Spray, J. A., Parshall, C. G., & Huang, C. - H.. (1997). Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

Pages