%0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2008 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Siebens, H. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Tao, W. %A Coster, W. J. %A Ni, P. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVES: To measure participation outcomes with a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and compare CAT and traditional fixed-length surveys in terms of score agreement, respondent burden, discriminant validity, and responsiveness. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective cohort study of patients interviewed approximately 2 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and 3 months later. SETTING: Follow-up interviews conducted in patient's home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=94) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation domains of mobility, domestic life, and community, social, & civic life, measured using a CAT version of the Participation Measure for Postacute Care (PM-PAC-CAT) and a 53-item fixed-length survey (PM-PAC-53). RESULTS: The PM-PAC-CAT showed substantial agreement with PM-PAC-53 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, model 3,1, .71-.81). On average, the PM-PAC-CAT was completed in 42% of the time and with only 48% of the items as compared with the PM-PAC-53. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The PM-PAC-CAT had modest reductions in sensitivity and responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval as compared with the PM-PAC-53. CONCLUSIONS: Although continued evaluation is warranted, accurate estimates of participation status and responsiveness to change for group-level analyses can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a sizeable reduction in respondent burden. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2008/01/30 %V 89 %P 275-283 %8 Feb %@ 1532-821X (Electronic)0003-9993 (Linking) %G eng %M 18226651 %2 2666330 %0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2006 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Siebens, H. %A Coster, W. J. %A Tao, W. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Ni, P. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVE: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective 1-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. SETTING: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). RESULTS: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2006/08/01 %V 87 %P 1033-42 %8 Aug %@ 0003-9993 (Print) %G eng %M 16876547