%0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2008 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Siebens, H. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Tao, W. %A Coster, W. J. %A Ni, P. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVES: To measure participation outcomes with a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and compare CAT and traditional fixed-length surveys in terms of score agreement, respondent burden, discriminant validity, and responsiveness. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective cohort study of patients interviewed approximately 2 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and 3 months later. SETTING: Follow-up interviews conducted in patient's home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=94) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation domains of mobility, domestic life, and community, social, & civic life, measured using a CAT version of the Participation Measure for Postacute Care (PM-PAC-CAT) and a 53-item fixed-length survey (PM-PAC-53). RESULTS: The PM-PAC-CAT showed substantial agreement with PM-PAC-53 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, model 3,1, .71-.81). On average, the PM-PAC-CAT was completed in 42% of the time and with only 48% of the items as compared with the PM-PAC-53. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The PM-PAC-CAT had modest reductions in sensitivity and responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval as compared with the PM-PAC-53. CONCLUSIONS: Although continued evaluation is warranted, accurate estimates of participation status and responsiveness to change for group-level analyses can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a sizeable reduction in respondent burden. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2008/01/30 %V 89 %P 275-283 %8 Feb %@ 1532-821X (Electronic)0003-9993 (Linking) %G eng %M 18226651 %2 2666330 %0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2006 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Siebens, H. %A Coster, W. J. %A Tao, W. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Ni, P. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVE: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective 1-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. SETTING: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). RESULTS: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2006/08/01 %V 87 %P 1033-42 %8 Aug %@ 0003-9993 (Print) %G eng %M 16876547 %0 Journal Article %J Rehabil Psychol %D 2005 %T Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation %A Ware, J. E %A Gandek, B. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Bjorner, J. B. %B Rehabil Psychol %V 50 %P 71-78 %0 Journal Article %J Medical Care %D 2004 %T Activity outcome measurement for postacute care %A Haley, S. M. %A Coster, W. J. %A Andres, P. L. %A Ludlow, L. H. %A Ni, P. %A Bond, T. L. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Self Efficacy %K *Sickness Impact Profile %K Activities of Daily Living/*classification/psychology %K Adult %K Aftercare/*standards/statistics & numerical data %K Aged %K Boston %K Cognition/physiology %K Disability Evaluation %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Human %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Movement/physiology %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods/statistics & numerical data %K Psychometrics %K Questionnaires/standards %K Rehabilitation/*standards/statistics & numerical data %K Reproducibility of Results %K Sensitivity and Specificity %K Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. %K Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. %X BACKGROUND: Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of a broad range of postacute care services have been hindered by the lack of conceptually sound and comprehensive measures of outcomes. It is critical to determine a common underlying structure before employing current methods of item equating across outcome instruments for future item banking and computer-adaptive testing applications. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factor structure, reliability, and scale properties of items underlying the Activity domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for use in postacute care outcome measurement. METHODS: We developed a 41-item Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AM-PAC) that assessed an individual's execution of discrete daily tasks in his or her own environment across major content domains as defined by the ICF. We evaluated the reliability and discriminant validity of the prototype AM-PAC in 477 individuals in active rehabilitation programs across 4 rehabilitation settings using factor analyses, tests of item scaling, internal consistency reliability analyses, Rasch item response theory modeling, residual component analysis, and modified parallel analysis. RESULTS: Results from an initial exploratory factor analysis produced 3 distinct, interpretable factors that accounted for 72% of the variance: Applied Cognition (44%), Personal Care & Instrumental Activities (19%), and Physical & Movement Activities (9%); these 3 activity factors were verified by a confirmatory factor analysis. Scaling assumptions were met for each factor in the total sample and across diagnostic groups. Internal consistency reliability was high for the total sample (Cronbach alpha = 0.92 to 0.94), and for specific diagnostic groups (Cronbach alpha = 0.90 to 0.95). Rasch scaling, residual factor, differential item functioning, and modified parallel analyses supported the unidimensionality and goodness of fit of each unique activity domain. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-factor model of the AM-PAC can form the conceptual basis for common-item equating and computer-adaptive applications, leading to a comprehensive system of outcome instruments for postacute care settings. %B Medical Care %V 42 %P I49-161 %G eng %M 14707755