Reckase, M. D.  (2024).  The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001

Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J..  (2023).  An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of  Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

DeMars, C. E.  (2022).  The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C..  (2019).  Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

van Buuren, N., Straat, H., Eggen, T., & Fox, J. - P..  (2017).  Adaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning with a Network Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Maslak, A., & Pozdniakov, S..  (2017).  Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web

Thompson, N.  (2017).  Developing a CAT: An Integrated Perspective. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jv8bpH2zkw5TqSMi03e5JJJ98QtXf-Cv

Han, S. - Y., & Yoo, Y. Joo.  (2017).  Efficiency of Item Selection in CD-CAT Based on Conjunctive Bayesian Network Modeling Hierarchical attributes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RbO2gd4aULqsSgRi_VZudNN_edX82NeD

Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T..  (2017).  From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ

Gierl, M., & Bulut, O..  (2017).  Generating Rationales to Support Formative Feedback in Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O5KDFtQlDLvhNoDr7X4JO4arpJkIHKUP

Verschoor, A.  (2017).  Grow a Tiger out of Your CAT . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Chen, T., Huang, C. - Y., & Liu, C..  (2017).  An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh

Gershon, R. C.  (2017).  Issues in Trait Range Coverage for Patient Reported Outcome Measure CATs - Extending the Ceiling for Above-average Physical Functioning. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZC02F-dIyYovEjzpeuRdoXDiXMLFRuKb

Reckase, M. D., He, W., Xu, J. - R., & Zhou, X..  (2017).  Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs

Chandra, I.  (2017).  Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M..  (2017).  Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for  Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al..  (2017).  New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa

von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T..  (2017).  New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Shen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L..  (2017).  Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students? Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Colvin, K., Keller, L. A., & Robin, F..  (2016).  Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic  Item Generation Context   . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101

Belov, D. I.  (2014).  Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

Schwall, A., & Sinar, E..  (2011).  Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: bUnique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G..  (2011).  catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Kingsbury, G. G.  (2011).  Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Wise, S. L.  (2011).  From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Hagge, S., Woo, A., & Dickison, P..  (2011).  Impact of Item Drift on Candidate Ability Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B..  (2011).  Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Verschoor, A.  (2011).  Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J..  (2011).  Practitioner?s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G..  (2010).  Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D..  (2009).  A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A..  (2008).  Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.

Lange, R.  (2008).  Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 81-104.

Kopec, J. A., Badii, M., McKenna, M., Lima, V. D., Sayre, E. C., & Dvorak, M..  (2008).  Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2008).  Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S..  (2008).  The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R..  (2008).  Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Chakravarty, E. F., Bjorner, J. B., & Fries, J. F..  (2007).  Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al..  (2007).  The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V..  (2007).  Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Rubio, V. J., Aguado, D., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M..  (2007).  Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.

van der Linden, W. J., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2006).  Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L..  (2006).  Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D..  (2006).  The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z..  (2006).  [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A..  (2006).  Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J..  (2006).  Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., Werneke, M. W., & Stratford, P. W..  (2006).  Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947?956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K..  (2006).  Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.

Núñez, R. M. N., & Pina, J. A. L..  (2006).  Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.

Hambleton, R. K.  (2005).  Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In C. C.  Gotay & Snyder, C., Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Haley, S. M., Raczek, A. E., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A..  (2005).  Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.

Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., & García-Hervás, E..  (2005).  An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.

Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X..  (2005).  A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2005).  A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D..  (2005).  A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W..  (2005).  Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al..  (2005).  Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Cook, K. F., O'Malley, K. J., & Roddey, T. S..  (2005).  Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D..  (2005).  Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J..  (2005).  Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Jun, Z., Dongming, O., Shuyuan, X., Haiqi, D., & Shuqing, Q..  (2005).  [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M..  (2005).  Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G..  (2005).  Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J..  (2005).  Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.

Ray, R. D.  (2004).  Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W.  Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E..  (2004).  Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 13-23.

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A..  (2004).  Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2004).  Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2004).  Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Chen, S. - Y., & Ankenmann, R. D..  (2004).  Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.

Revuelta, J.  (2004).  Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.

Davis, L. L.  (2004).  Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.

Meijer, R. R.  (2004).  Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

McLeod, L., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D..  (2003).  A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N..  (2003).  A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G..  (2003).  Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2003).  Optimal stratification of item pools in ?-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A..  (2003).  The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S..  (2003).  Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H..  (2002).  A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Ban, J. - C., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J..  (2002).  Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F..  (2002).  An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.

Balajthy, E.  (2002).  Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A..  (2002).  Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Meijer, R. R.  (2002).  Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M..  (2002).  A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Roberts, J. S., Lin, Y., & Laughlin, J. E..  (2001).  Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.

Sijtsma, K.  (2001).  Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Thissen, D., Nelson, L. A., & Swygert, K. A..  (2001).  Item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items--approximation methods for scale scores. In Test scoring (pp. 289-315). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H..  (2000).  A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Hambleton, R. K.  (2000).  Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M..  (2000).  Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.

Smith, R. W.  (2000).  An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

van der Linden, W. J., Veldkamp, B. P., & Reese, L. M..  (2000).  An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D..  (1999).  Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.

Tang, K. L.  (1996).  A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.