TY - JOUR T1 - The effect of including pretest items in an operational computerized adaptive test: Do different ability examinees spend different amounts of time on embedded pretest items? JF - Educational Assessment Y1 - 2007 A1 - Ferdous, A. A. A1 - Plake, B. S. A1 - Chang, S-R. KW - ability KW - operational computerized adaptive test KW - pretest items KW - time AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pretest items on response time in an operational, fixed-length, time-limited computerized adaptive test (CAT). These pretest items are embedded within the CAT, but unlike the operational items, are not tailored to the examinee's ability level. If examinees with higher ability levels need less time to complete these items than do their counterparts with lower ability levels, they will have more time to devote to the operational test questions. Data were from a graduate admissions test that was administered worldwide. Data from both quantitative and verbal sections of the test were considered. For the verbal section, examinees in the lower ability groups spent systematically more time on their pretest items than did those in the higher ability groups, though for the quantitative section the differences were less clear. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) PB - Lawrence Erlbaum: US VL - 12 SN - 1062-7197 (Print); 1532-6977 (Electronic) ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first? JF - Journal of Educational Measurement Y1 - 2001 A1 - Hau, Kit-Tai A1 - Chang, Hua-Hua KW - ability KW - Adaptive Testing KW - Computer Assisted Testing KW - Estimation KW - Statistical KW - Test Items computerized adaptive testing AB - During computerized adaptive testing (CAT), items are selected continuously according to the test-taker's estimated ability. Test security has become a problem because high-discrimination items are more likely to be selected and become overexposed. So, there seems to be a tradeoff between high efficiency in ability estimations and balanced usage of items. This series of four studies addressed the dilemma by focusing on the notion of whether more or less discriminating items should be used first in CAT. The first study demonstrated that the common maximum information method with J. B. Sympson and R. D. Hetter (1985) control resulted in the use of more discriminating items first. The remaining studies showed that using items in the reverse order, as described in H. Chang and Z. Yings (1999) stratified method had potential advantages: (a) a more balanced item usage and (b) a relatively stable resultant item pool structure with easy and inexpensive management. This stratified method may have ability-estimation efficiency better than or close to that of other methods. It is argued that the judicious selection of items, as in the stratified method, is a more active control of item exposure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2005 APA ) VL - 38 ER -