TY - JOUR T1 - Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 JF - Journal of Personality Assessment Y1 - 1995 A1 - Roper, B. L. A1 - Ben-Porath, Y. S. A1 - Butcher, J. N. AB - The comparability and validity of a computerized adaptive (CA) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 571 undergraduate college students. The CA MMPI-2 administered adaptively Scales L, E the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales, utilizing the countdown method (Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985). All subjects completed the MMPI-2 twice, with three experimental conditions: booklet test-retest, booklet-CA, and conventional computerized (CC)-CA. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of the three forms. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and other psychometric measures (Beck Depression Inventory; Symptom Checklist-Revised; State-Trait Anxiety and Anger Scales; and the Anger Expression Scale) support the validity of the CA MMPI-2. Substantial item savings may be realized with the implementation of the countdown procedure. VL - 65 SN - 0022-3891 (Print) N1 - Roper, B LBen-Porath, Y SButcher, J NUnited StatesJournal of personality assessmentJ Pers Assess. 1995 Oct;65(2):358-71. ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 JF - Dissertation Abstracts International Y1 - 1993 A1 - Roper, B. L. KW - computerized adaptive testing VL - 53 ER - TY - CONF T1 - Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration T2 - Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2 Y1 - 1992 A1 - Ben-Porath, Y. S. A1 - Roper, B. L. JF - Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2 CY - Minneapolis MN ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2 JF - Journal of Personality Assessment Y1 - 1991 A1 - Roper, B. L. A1 - Ben-Porath, Y. S. A1 - Butcher, J. N. AB - A computerized adaptive version and the standard version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were administered 1 week apart to a sample of 155 college students to assess the comparability of the two versions. The countdown method was used to adaptively administer Scales L, F, the I0 clinical scales, and the 15 new content scales. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Substantial item savings were found with the adaptive version. Future directions in the study of adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 are discussed. VL - 57 SN - 0022-3891 (Print) N1 - Roper, B LBen-Porath, Y SButcher, J NUnited StatesJournal of personality assessmentJ Pers Assess. 1991 Oct;57(2):278-90. ER - TY - CONF T1 - An empirical study of the computer adaptive MMPI-2 T2 - Paper presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on recent developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2 Y1 - 1990 A1 - Ben-Porath, Y. S. A1 - Roper, B. L. A1 - Butcher, J. N. JF - Paper presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on recent developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2 CY - Minneapolis MN ER - TY - CONF T1 - Illustration of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 T2 - Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association Y1 - 1990 A1 - Roper, B. L. A1 - Ben-Porath, Y. S. A1 - Butcher, J. N. JF - Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association CY - Boston MA ER -