01580nas a2200205   4500008004100000020002200041245005000063210005000113260002600163300001200189490000700201520094200208653003401150653002801184653001901212653002001231653003301251100002301284856006701307       2006                        eng d  a0146-6216 (Print)00aEquating scores from adaptive to linear tests0 aEquating scores from adaptive to linear tests  bSage Publications: US  a493-5080 v303 aTwo local methods for observed-score equating are applied to the problem of equating an adaptive test to a linear test. In an empirical study, the methods were evaluated against a method based on the test characteristic function (TCF) of the linear test and traditional equipercentile equating applied to the ability estimates on the adaptive test for a population of test takers. The two local methods were generally best. Surprisingly, the TCF method performed slightly worse than the equipercentile method. Both methods showed strong bias and uniformly large inaccuracy, but the TCF method suffered from extra error due to the lower asymptote of the test characteristic function. It is argued that the worse performances of the two methods are a consequence of the fact that they use a single equating transformation for an entire population of test takers and therefore have to compromise between the individual score distributions. 10acomputerized adaptive testing10aequipercentile equating10alocal equating10ascore reporting10atest characteristic function1 avan der Linden, WJ  uhttp://iacat.org/content/equating-scores-adaptive-linear-tests