@article {2280,
	title = {Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable-Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement?},
	journal = {Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {1-18},
	issn = {2165-6592},
	doi = {10.7333/1212-0101001},
	author = {Babcock, B. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {1455,
	title = {Better Data From Better Measurements Using Computerized Adaptive Testing},
	journal = {Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences},
	volume = {Vol. 2},
	number = {1},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {1-27},
	edition = {No. 1},
	abstract = {The process of constructing a fixed-length conventional test frequently focuses on maximizing internal consistency reliability by selecting test items that are of average difficulty and high discrimination (a --peaked{\textbardbl} test). The effect of constructing such a test, when viewed from the perspective of item response theory, is test scores that are precise for examinees whose trait levels are near the point at which the test is peaked; as examinee trait levels deviate from the mean, the precision of their scores decreases substantially. Results of a small simulation study demonstrate that when peaked tests are --off target{\textbardbl} for an examinee, their scores are biased and have spuriously high standard deviations, reflecting substantial amounts of error. These errors can reduce the correlations of these kinds of scores with other variables and adversely affect the results of standard statistical tests. By contrast, scores from adaptive tests are essentially unbiased and have standard deviations that are much closer to true values. Basic concepts of adaptive testing are introduced and fully adaptive computerized tests (CATs) based on IRT are described. Several examples of response records from CATs are discussed to illustrate how CATs function. Some operational issues, including item exposure, content balancing, and enemy items are also briefly discussed. It is concluded that because CAT constructs a unique test for examinee, scores from CATs will be more precise and should provide better data for social science research and applications.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {390,
	title = {A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests},
	journal = {Practical Assessment Research \& Evaluation},
	volume = {16},
	number = {1},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {Practical Assessment Research \& Evaluation},
	abstract = {A substantial amount of research has been conducted over the past 40 years on technical aspects of computerized adaptive testing (CAT), such as item selection algorithms, item exposure controls, and termination criteria. However, there is little literature providing practical guidance on the development of a CAT. This paper seeks to collate some of the available research methodologies into a general framework for the development of any CAT assessment. },
	author = {Thompson, N. A. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {2039,
	title = {Measuring Individual Growth With Conventional and Adaptive Tests},
	journal = {Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {80-101},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Von Minden, S.}
}
@article {2071,
	title = {Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {34},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {238-254},
	abstract = {<p>Assessing individual change is an important topic in both psychological and educational measurement. An adaptive measurement of change (AMC) method had previously been shown to exhibit greater efficiency in detecting change than conventional nonadaptive methods. However, little work had been done to compare different procedures within the AMC framework. This study introduced a new item selection criterion and two new test statistics for detecting change with AMC that were specifically designed for the paradigm of hypothesis testing. In two simulation sets, the new methods for detecting significant change improved on existing procedures by demonstrating better adherence to Type I error rates and substantially better power for detecting relatively small change.\&nbsp;</p>
},
	keywords = {change, computerized adaptive testing, individual change, Kullback{\textendash}Leibler information, likelihood ratio, measuring change},
	doi = {10.1177/0146621609344844},
	author = {Finkelman, M. D. and Weiss,  D. J. and Kim-Kang, G.}
}
@article {2125,
	title = {Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {Assessment Systems Corporation},
	address = {St. Paul, MN},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Guyer, R. D.}
}
@inbook {1787,
	title = {Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta},
	year = {2009},
	note = {{PDF File, 212 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	author = {Guyer, R. D. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1862,
	title = {A hybrid simulation procedure for the development of CATs},
	year = {2009},
	note = {{PDF File, 258 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	author = {Nydick, S. W. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1766,
	title = {Item selection and hypothesis testing for the adaptive measurement of change},
	year = {2009},
	note = {{PDF File, 228 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	author = {Finkelman, M. and Weiss,  D. J. and Kim-Kang, G.}
}
@inbook {1729,
	title = {Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Variable-length CATs are not biased.},
	year = {2009},
	address = { D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	author = {Babcock, B. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {590,
	title = {Adaptive measurement of individual change},
	journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie / Journal of Psychology},
	volume = {216},
	year = {2008},
	note = {{PDF file, 568 KB}},
	pages = {49-58},
	doi = {10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.49},
	author = {Kim-Kang, G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {152,
	title = {Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment},
	journal = {Psychiatric Services},
	volume = {59},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Gibbons, Robert DWeiss, David JKupfer, David JFrank, EllenFagiolini, AndreaGrochocinski, Victoria JBhaumik, Dulal KStover, AngelaBock, R DarrellImmekus, Jason CR01-MH-30915/MH/United States NIMHR01-MH-66302/MH/United States NIMHResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Apr;59(4):361-8.},
	month = {Apr},
	pages = {361-8},
	edition = {2008/04/02},
	abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the combination of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for psychiatric measurement as a means of reducing the burden of research and clinical assessments. METHODS: Data were from 800 participants in outpatient treatment for a mood or anxiety disorder; they completed 616 items of the 626-item Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Scales (MASS) at two times. The first administration was used to design and evaluate a CAT version of the MASS by using post hoc simulation. The second confirmed the functioning of CAT in live testing. RESULTS: Tests of competing models based on item response theory supported the scale{\textquoteright}s bifactor structure, consisting of a primary dimension and four group factors (mood, panic-agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive, and social phobia). Both simulated and live CAT showed a 95\% average reduction (585 items) in items administered (24 and 30 items, respectively) compared with administration of the full MASS. The correlation between scores on the full MASS and the CAT version was .93. For the mood disorder subscale, differences in scores between two groups of depressed patients--one with bipolar disorder and one without--on the full scale and on the CAT showed effect sizes of .63 (p<.003) and 1.19 (p<.001) standard deviation units, respectively, indicating better discriminant validity for CAT. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of using small fixed-length tests, clinicians can create item banks with a large item pool, and a small set of the items most relevant for a given individual can be administered with no loss of information, yielding a dramatic reduction in administration time and patient and clinician burden.},
	keywords = {*Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, *Questionnaires, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agoraphobia/diagnosis, Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis, Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders/*diagnosis, Middle Aged, Mood Disorders/diagnosis, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis, Panic Disorder/diagnosis, Phobic Disorders/diagnosis, Reproducibility of Results, Time Factors},
	isbn = {1075-2730 (Print)},
	author = {Gibbons, R. D. and Weiss,  D. J. and Kupfer, D. J. and Frank, E. and Fagiolini, A. and Grochocinski, V. J. and Bhaumik, D. K. and Stover, A. and Bock, R. D. and Immekus, J. C.}
}
@inbook {1806,
	title = {Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change},
	year = {2007},
	note = {{PDF file, 347 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	author = {Kim-Kang, G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1949,
	title = {Computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model},
	year = {2007},
	note = {{PDF file, 159 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Gibbons, R. D.}
}
@article {328,
	title = {Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)},
	journal = {Medical Care},
	volume = {45},
	number = {5 Suppl 1},
	year = {2007},
	note = {Reeve, Bryce BHays, Ron DBjorner, Jakob BCook, Karon FCrane, Paul KTeresi, Jeanne AThissen, DavidRevicki, Dennis AWeiss, David JHambleton, Ronald KLiu, HonghuGershon, RichardReise, Steven PLai, Jin-sheiCella, DavidPROMIS Cooperative GroupAG015815/AG/United States NIAResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesMedical careMed Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-31.},
	month = {May},
	pages = {S22-31},
	edition = {2007/04/20},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: The construction and evaluation of item banks to measure unidimensional constructs of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a fundamental objective of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project. OBJECTIVES: Item banks will be used as the foundation for developing short-form instruments and enabling computerized adaptive testing. The PROMIS Steering Committee selected 5 HRQOL domains for initial focus: physical functioning, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social role participation. This report provides an overview of the methods used in the PROMIS item analyses and proposed calibration of item banks. ANALYSES: Analyses include evaluation of data quality (eg, logic and range checking, spread of response distribution within an item), descriptive statistics (eg, frequencies, means), item response theory model assumptions (unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity), model fit, differential item functioning, and item calibration for banking. RECOMMENDATIONS: Summarized are key analytic issues; recommendations are provided for future evaluations of item banks in HRQOL assessment.},
	keywords = {*Health Status, *Information Systems, *Quality of Life, *Self Disclosure, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Calibration, Databases as Topic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods, Psychometrics, Questionnaires/standards, United States},
	isbn = {0025-7079 (Print)},
	author = {Reeve, B. B. and Hays, R. D. and Bjorner, J. B. and Cook, K. F. and Crane, P. K. and Teresi, J. A. and Thissen, D. and Revicki, D. A. and Weiss,  D. J. and Hambleton, R. K. and Liu, H. and Gershon, R. C. and Reise, S. P. and Lai, J. S. and Cella, D.}
}
@article {2177,
	title = {Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education},
	journal = {Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development},
	volume = {37},
	number = {2},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {70-84},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1948,
	title = {Improving individual differences measurement with item response theory and computerized adaptive testing},
	year = {1995},
	address = {D. Lubinski and R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 49-79). Palo Alto CA: Davies-Black Publishing.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {802,
	title = {Adaptive testing},
	journal = {Applied Psychology: An International Review},
	volume = {36},
	year = {1987},
	pages = {249-262},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Vale, C. D.}
}
@inbook {1952,
	title = {Computerized adaptive testing for measuring abilities and other psychological variables},
	year = {1987},
	address = {J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized personality measurement: A practitioners guide (pp. 325-343). New York: Basic Books.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Vale, C. D.}
}
@article {800,
	title = {Adaptive testing by computer},
	journal = {Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology},
	volume = {53},
	year = {1985},
	pages = {774-789},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1573,
	title = {Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability},
	year = {1985},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1947,
	title = {Introduction},
	year = {1985},
	address = {In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@book {1721,
	title = {Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference},
	year = {1985},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {801,
	title = {Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1984},
	pages = {273-285},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and J. R. McBride}
}
@article {2014,
	title = {Bias and Information of Bayesian Adaptive Testing},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1984},
	pages = {273-285},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and J. R. McBride}
}
@conference {1194,
	title = {Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association},
	year = {1984},
	address = {New Orleans LA},
	author = {Sympson, J. B. and Weiss,  D. J. and Ree, M. J.}
}
@article {2013,
	title = {Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1984},
	pages = {155-163},
	author = {Moreno, K. E. and Wetzel, C. D. and J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {285,
	title = {Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {8},
	number = {2},
	year = {1984},
	note = {Sage Publications, US},
	pages = {155-163},
	abstract = {Investigated the relationships between selected subtests from the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and corresponding subtests administered as computerized adaptive tests (CATs), using 270 17-26 yr old Marine recruits as Ss. Ss were administered the ASVAB before enlisting and approximately 2 wks after entering active duty, and the CAT tests were administered to Ss approximately 24 hrs after arriving at the recruit depot. Results indicate that 3 adaptive subtests correlated as well with ASVAB as did the 2nd administration of the ASVAB, although CAT subtests contained only half the number of items. Factor analysis showed CAT subtests to load on the same factors as the corresponding ASVAB subtests, indicating that the same abilities were being measured. It is concluded that CAT can achieve the same measurement precision as a conventional test, with half the number of items. (16 ref) },
	keywords = {computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Moreno, K. E. and Wetzel, C. D. and J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1418,
	title = {Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits},
	year = {1983},
	address = {Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Kiely, G. L. and A Zara and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1575,
	title = {Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 83-2)},
	year = {1983},
	note = {{PDF file, 1.066MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and J. R. McBride}
}
@inbook {226,
	title = {A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure.},
	booktitle = {New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing},
	year = {1983},
	pages = {258-283},
	publisher = {Academic Press.},
	organization = {Academic Press.},
	address = {New York, NY. USA},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1950,
	title = {A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure},
	year = {1983},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.},
	author = {Kingsbury, G.G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1812,
	title = {A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure},
	year = {1983},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1572,
	title = {Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities},
	year = {1983},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@book {1720,
	title = {New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing},
	year = {1983},
	address = {New York: Academic Press},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1915,
	title = {The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item response theory models},
	year = {1983},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.},
	author = {Trabin, T. E. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1481,
	title = {Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27)},
	year = {1983},
	address = {San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center},
	author = {Moreno, K. E. and Wetzel, D. C. and J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1469,
	title = {Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1)},
	year = {1983},
	address = {Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory},
	author = {J. R. McBride and Martin, J. T. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1456,
	title = {Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1).},
	year = {1983},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.787 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.},
	author = {Martin, J. T. and J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1571,
	title = {The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3)},
	year = {1983},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {2012,
	title = {Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1982},
	pages = {473-492},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1632,
	title = {Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40)},
	year = {1982},
	note = {$\#$SY82-01},
	address = {Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division},
	author = {Sympson, J. B. and Weiss,  D. J. and Ree, M. J.}
}
@inbook {1951,
	title = {Robustness of adaptive testing to multidimensionality},
	year = {1982},
	note = {42 MB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. {PDF file, 1.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Suhadolnik, D.}
}
@booklet {1457,
	title = {Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4)},
	year = {1981},
	note = {{PDF file, 1.689 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Maurelli, V. A. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1570,
	title = {Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing},
	year = {1981},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1423,
	title = {A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3)},
	year = {1981},
	note = {{PDF file, 1.855 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1422,
	title = {An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5)},
	year = {1980},
	note = {{PDF file, 1.11 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1421,
	title = {A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4)},
	year = {1980},
	note = {{PDF file, 1.905 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1811,
	title = {A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method},
	year = {1980},
	note = {51 MB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1516,
	title = {Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3)},
	year = {1980},
	note = {$\#$TH80-03 {PDF file, 2.708 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Thompson, J. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1494,
	title = {Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2)},
	year = {1980},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.323 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Pine, S. M. and Church, A. T. and Gialluca, K. A. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1569,
	title = {Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation},
	year = {1980},
	address = {Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1802,
	title = {Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies},
	year = {1980},
	note = {{PDF file, 918 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.},
	author = {Johnson, M. J. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@book {1719,
	title = {Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference},
	year = {1980},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1420,
	title = {An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5)},
	year = {1979},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.146 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {1967,
	title = {Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6)},
	year = {1979},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Gialluca, K. A. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1493,
	title = {A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1)},
	year = {1978},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Pine, S. M. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1324,
	title = {A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4)},
	year = {1978},
	address = {Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Bejar, I. I. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@book {1718,
	title = {Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference},
	year = {1978},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {735,
	title = {The stratified adaptive ability test as a tool for personnel selection and placement},
	journal = {TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1978},
	pages = {135-151},
	author = {Vale, C. D. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1341,
	title = {An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6)},
	year = {1977},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.40 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Brown, J. M and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1568,
	title = {Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1)},
	year = {1977},
	note = {{PDF file, 3.228 KB}},
	address = {Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1327,
	title = {Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5)},
	year = {1977},
	address = {Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Bejar, I. I. and Weiss,  D. J. and Kingsbury, G. G.}
}
@booklet {1326,
	title = {An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7)},
	year = {1977},
	address = {Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Bejar, I. I. and Weiss,  D. J. and Gialluca, K. A.}
}
@inbook {1981,
	title = {Multi-Content Adaptive Measurement of Achievement},
	year = {1977},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Brown, J. M}
}
@booklet {1528,
	title = {A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4)},
	year = {1977},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Vale, C. D. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1946,
	title = {Adaptive testing research at Minnesota: Overview, recent results, and future directions},
	year = {1976},
	note = {{PDF file, 768 KB}},
	address = {C. L. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 24-35). Washington DC: United States Civil Service Commission.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1333,
	title = {Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3)},
	year = {1976},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Betz, N. E. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {531,
	title = {Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system},
	journal = {Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1976},
	pages = {104-107},
	author = {DeWitt, L. J. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1334,
	title = {Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4)},
	year = {1976},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Betz, N. E. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1472,
	title = {Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1)},
	year = {1976},
	address = {Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@article {799,
	title = {Computerized adaptive ability measurement},
	journal = {Naval Research Reviews},
	volume = {28},
	year = {1975},
	pages = {1-18},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1945,
	title = {Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and prospects (Research Report 75-5)},
	year = {1975},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1332,
	title = {Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3)},
	year = {1975},
	address = {Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Betz, N. E. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1430,
	title = {An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1)},
	year = {1975},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Larkin, K. C. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1527,
	title = {A simulation study of stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-6)},
	year = {1975},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Vale, C. D. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1526,
	title = {A study of computer-administered stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-4)},
	year = {1975},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Vale, C. D. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1361,
	title = {A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1)},
	year = {1974},
	address = {Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {De Witt, J. J. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1429,
	title = {An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3)},
	year = {1974},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Larkin, K. C. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@inbook {1853,
	title = {Recent and projected developments in ability testing by computer},
	year = {1974},
	address = {Earl Jones (Ed.), Symposium Proceedings: Occupational Research and the Navy{\textendash}Prospectus 1980 (TR-74-14). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.},
	author = {J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1331,
	title = {Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4)},
	year = {1974},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.92 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Betz, N. E. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1567,
	title = {Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5)},
	year = {1974},
	note = {{PDF file, 5.555 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1471,
	title = {A word knowledge item pool for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-2)},
	year = {1974},
	address = {Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {J. R. McBride and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1574,
	title = {Ability measurement: Conventional or adaptive? (Research Report 73-1)},
	year = {1973},
	note = {{PDF file, 4.98 MB}.},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J. and Betz, N. E.}
}
@booklet {1330,
	title = {An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4)},
	year = {1973},
	address = {Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Betz, N. E. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1566,
	title = {The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3)},
	year = {1973},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.498 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@conference {1254,
	title = {Individualized assessment of differential abilities},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.},
	year = {1969},
	author = {Weiss,  D. J.}
}
