@article {21,
	title = {NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination},
	journal = {Journal of Professional Nursing},
	volume = {17},
	number = {4},
	year = {2001},
	note = {8755-7223Journal Article},
	month = {Jul-Aug},
	pages = {158-165},
	abstract = {Since the adoption of the Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) format of the National Certification Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN), no studies have been reported in the literature on predictors of successful performance by baccalaureate nursing graduates on the licensure examination. In this study, a discriminant analysis was used to identify which of 21 variables can be significant predictors of success on the CAT NCLEX-RN. The convenience sample consisted of 289 individuals who graduated from a baccalaureate nursing program between 1995 and 1998. Seven significant predictor variables were identified. The total number of C+ or lower grades earned in nursing theory courses was the best predictor, followed by grades in several individual nursing courses. More than 93 per cent of graduates were correctly classified. Ninety-four per cent of NCLEX "passes" were correctly classified, as were 92 per cent of NCLEX failures. This degree of accuracy in classifying CAT NCLEX-RN failures represents a marked improvement over results reported in previous studies of licensure examinations, and suggests the discriminant function will be helpful in identifying future students in danger of failure. J Prof Nurs 17:158-165, 2001.},
	keywords = {*Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, *Educational Measurement, *Licensure, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Software},
	author = {Beeman, P. B. and Waterhouse, J. K.}
}
@article {216,
	title = {Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam},
	journal = {Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report},
	volume = {9},
	number = {1},
	year = {1996},
	note = {Journal Article},
	month = {Jan-Feb},
	pages = {6-7},
	abstract = {The new computerized NCLEX system is working well. Most new candidates, employers, and board of nursing representatives like the computerized adaptive testing system and the fast report of results. But, among the candidates themselves some myths have grown which cause them needless anxiety.},
	keywords = {*Educational Measurement, *Licensure, Humans, Nursing Staff, Personnel Selection, United States},
	author = {Johnson, S. H.}
}
@article {126,
	title = {Computerized adaptive testing for NCLEX-PN},
	journal = {Journal of Practical Nursing},
	volume = {42},
	number = {2},
	year = {1992},
	note = {Fields, F AUnited statesThe Journal of practical nursingJ Pract Nurs. 1992 Jun;42(2):8-10.},
	month = {Jun},
	pages = {8-10},
	edition = {1992/06/01},
	keywords = {*Licensure, *Programmed Instruction, Educational Measurement/*methods, Humans, Nursing, Practical/*education},
	isbn = {0022-3867 (Print)},
	author = {Fields, F. A.}
}
@article {37,
	title = {Future directions for the National Council: the Computerized Adaptive Testing Project},
	journal = {Issues},
	volume = {11},
	number = {4},
	year = {1990},
	note = {911613080885-0046Journal Article},
	pages = {1, 3, 5},
	keywords = {*Computers, *Licensure, Educational Measurement/*methods, Societies, Nursing, United States},
	author = {Bouchard, J.}
}
@article {190,
	title = {National Council Computerized Adaptive Testing Project Review--committee perspective},
	journal = {Issues},
	volume = {11},
	number = {4},
	year = {1990},
	note = {911613110885-0046Journal Article},
	pages = {3},
	keywords = {*Computers, *Licensure, Educational Measurement/*methods, Feasibility Studies, Societies, Nursing, United States},
	author = {Haynes, B.}
}
