@article {545,
	title = {A conditional exposure control method for multidimensional adaptive testing},
	journal = {Journal of Educational Measurement},
	volume = {46},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {84-103},
	author = {Finkelman, M. and Nering, M. L. and Roussos, L. A.}
}
@article {642,
	title = {Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {23},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {187-194},
	author = {Meijer, R. R. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@article {280,
	title = {Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {23},
	number = {3},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {187-94},
	abstract = {Use of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) has increased substantially since it was first formulated in the 1970s. This paper provides an overview of CAT and introduces the contributions to this Special Issue. The elements of CAT discussed here include item selection procedures, estimation of the latent trait, item exposure, measurement precision, and item bank development. Some topics for future research are also presented. },
	keywords = {computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Meijer, R. R. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@conference {1205,
	title = {Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education},
	year = {1998},
	address = {San Diego},
	author = {Thompson, T. and Davey, T. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@conference {1206,
	title = {Constructing passage-based tests that parallel conventional programs},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society},
	year = {1998},
	address = {Urbana, IL},
	author = {Thompson, T. and Davey, T. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@conference {890,
	title = {Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled {\textquotedblleft}Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments},
	year = {1998},
	address = {{\textquotedblright} Philadelphia PA},
	author = {Davey, T. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@conference {889,
	title = {Evaluating and insuring measurement precision in adaptive testing},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society},
	year = {1998},
	address = {Urbana, IL},
	author = {Davey, T. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@conference {1071,
	title = {A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society},
	year = {1998},
	address = {Urbana, IL},
	author = {Nering, M. L. and Davey, T. and Thompson, T.}
}
@conference {1078,
	title = {A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society},
	year = {1998},
	address = {Urbana, IL},
	author = {Nering, M. L. and Davey, T. and Thompson, T.}
}
@conference {1081,
	title = {Test development exposure control for adaptive testing},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education},
	year = {1998},
	address = {San Diego, CA},
	author = {Parshall, C. G. and Davey, T. and Nering, M. L.}
}
@article {292,
	title = {The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {21},
	number = {2},
	year = {1997},
	note = {Journal; Peer Reviewed Journal},
	pages = {115-127},
	abstract = {The extent to which a trait estimate represents the underlying latent trait of interest can be estimated by using indexes of person fit. Several statistical methods for indexing person fit have been proposed to identify nonmodel-fitting response vectors. These person-fit indexes have generally been found to follow a standard normal distribution for conventionally administered tests. The present investigation found that within the context of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) these indexes tended not to follow a standard normal distribution. As the item pool became less discriminating, as the CAT termination criterion became less stringent, and as the number of items in the pool decreased, the distributions of the indexes approached a standard normal distribution. It was determined that under these conditions the indexes{\textquoteright} distributions approached standard normal distributions because more items were being administered. However, even when over 50 items were administered in a CAT the indexes were distributed in a fashion that was different from what was expected. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA )},
	keywords = {Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Fit, Person Environment},
	author = {Nering, M. L.}
}
@book {1686,
	title = {The effects of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing},
	year = {1996},
	address = {Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis},
	author = {Nering, M. L.}
}
