@article {2071,
	title = {Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change},
	journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement},
	volume = {34},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {238-254},
	abstract = {<p>Assessing individual change is an important topic in both psychological and educational measurement. An adaptive measurement of change (AMC) method had previously been shown to exhibit greater efficiency in detecting change than conventional nonadaptive methods. However, little work had been done to compare different procedures within the AMC framework. This study introduced a new item selection criterion and two new test statistics for detecting change with AMC that were specifically designed for the paradigm of hypothesis testing. In two simulation sets, the new methods for detecting significant change improved on existing procedures by demonstrating better adherence to Type I error rates and substantially better power for detecting relatively small change.\&nbsp;</p>
},
	keywords = {change, computerized adaptive testing, individual change, Kullback{\textendash}Leibler information, likelihood ratio, measuring change},
	doi = {10.1177/0146621609344844},
	author = {Finkelman, M. D. and Weiss,  D. J. and Kim-Kang, G.}
}
@article {152,
	title = {Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment},
	journal = {Psychiatric Services},
	volume = {59},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Gibbons, Robert DWeiss, David JKupfer, David JFrank, EllenFagiolini, AndreaGrochocinski, Victoria JBhaumik, Dulal KStover, AngelaBock, R DarrellImmekus, Jason CR01-MH-30915/MH/United States NIMHR01-MH-66302/MH/United States NIMHResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Apr;59(4):361-8.},
	month = {Apr},
	pages = {361-8},
	edition = {2008/04/02},
	abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the combination of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for psychiatric measurement as a means of reducing the burden of research and clinical assessments. METHODS: Data were from 800 participants in outpatient treatment for a mood or anxiety disorder; they completed 616 items of the 626-item Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Scales (MASS) at two times. The first administration was used to design and evaluate a CAT version of the MASS by using post hoc simulation. The second confirmed the functioning of CAT in live testing. RESULTS: Tests of competing models based on item response theory supported the scale{\textquoteright}s bifactor structure, consisting of a primary dimension and four group factors (mood, panic-agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive, and social phobia). Both simulated and live CAT showed a 95\% average reduction (585 items) in items administered (24 and 30 items, respectively) compared with administration of the full MASS. The correlation between scores on the full MASS and the CAT version was .93. For the mood disorder subscale, differences in scores between two groups of depressed patients--one with bipolar disorder and one without--on the full scale and on the CAT showed effect sizes of .63 (p<.003) and 1.19 (p<.001) standard deviation units, respectively, indicating better discriminant validity for CAT. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of using small fixed-length tests, clinicians can create item banks with a large item pool, and a small set of the items most relevant for a given individual can be administered with no loss of information, yielding a dramatic reduction in administration time and patient and clinician burden.},
	keywords = {*Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, *Questionnaires, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agoraphobia/diagnosis, Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis, Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders/*diagnosis, Middle Aged, Mood Disorders/diagnosis, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis, Panic Disorder/diagnosis, Phobic Disorders/diagnosis, Reproducibility of Results, Time Factors},
	isbn = {1075-2730 (Print)},
	author = {Gibbons, R. D. and Weiss,  D. J. and Kupfer, D. J. and Frank, E. and Fagiolini, A. and Grochocinski, V. J. and Bhaumik, D. K. and Stover, A. and Bock, R. D. and Immekus, J. C.}
}
@article {328,
	title = {Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)},
	journal = {Medical Care},
	volume = {45},
	number = {5 Suppl 1},
	year = {2007},
	note = {Reeve, Bryce BHays, Ron DBjorner, Jakob BCook, Karon FCrane, Paul KTeresi, Jeanne AThissen, DavidRevicki, Dennis AWeiss, David JHambleton, Ronald KLiu, HonghuGershon, RichardReise, Steven PLai, Jin-sheiCella, DavidPROMIS Cooperative GroupAG015815/AG/United States NIAResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesMedical careMed Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-31.},
	month = {May},
	pages = {S22-31},
	edition = {2007/04/20},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: The construction and evaluation of item banks to measure unidimensional constructs of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a fundamental objective of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project. OBJECTIVES: Item banks will be used as the foundation for developing short-form instruments and enabling computerized adaptive testing. The PROMIS Steering Committee selected 5 HRQOL domains for initial focus: physical functioning, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social role participation. This report provides an overview of the methods used in the PROMIS item analyses and proposed calibration of item banks. ANALYSES: Analyses include evaluation of data quality (eg, logic and range checking, spread of response distribution within an item), descriptive statistics (eg, frequencies, means), item response theory model assumptions (unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity), model fit, differential item functioning, and item calibration for banking. RECOMMENDATIONS: Summarized are key analytic issues; recommendations are provided for future evaluations of item banks in HRQOL assessment.},
	keywords = {*Health Status, *Information Systems, *Quality of Life, *Self Disclosure, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Calibration, Databases as Topic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods, Psychometrics, Questionnaires/standards, United States},
	isbn = {0025-7079 (Print)},
	author = {Reeve, B. B. and Hays, R. D. and Bjorner, J. B. and Cook, K. F. and Crane, P. K. and Teresi, J. A. and Thissen, D. and Revicki, D. A. and Weiss,  D. J. and Hambleton, R. K. and Liu, H. and Gershon, R. C. and Reise, S. P. and Lai, J. S. and Cella, D.}
}
